Re: intrinsic advantage of Latin alphabet over bopomofo (for Chinese)??
- From: "Dylan Sung" <dylanwhs.tsktsktsk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 5 Apr 2007 07:50:29 +0100
"Oliver Cromm" <lispamateur@xxxxxxxx> wrote in message news:hn5u4al8m5k3.dlg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
* LEE Sau Dan wrote:
"Peter" == Peter T Daniels <grammatim@xxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
>> A picture of an appropriate sequence of pyramids would
>> certainly locate the Giza plateau. And it would not be at all
>> difficult to write the idea of the earths poles.
Peter> But the name is "Giza," not "Three Pyramids."
What if that picture of the Three Pyramids has become a logo or icon
for Giza?
Then it will be read "Giza" and the Japanese will use it, reduplicated,
for "gizagiza" (zigzag). Or something like that. Look what happened to
the hieroglyphs.
Hmm, hieroglyphshieroglyphs. Is it likely?
:D
Dyl.
.
- References:
- Re: intrinsic advantage of Latin alphabet over bopomofo (for Chinese)??
- From: Herman Rubin
- Re: intrinsic advantage of Latin alphabet over bopomofo (for Chinese)??
- From: Peter T. Daniels
- Re: intrinsic advantage of Latin alphabet over bopomofo (for Chinese)??
- From: LEE Sau Dan
- Re: intrinsic advantage of Latin alphabet over bopomofo (for Chinese)??
- From: Oliver Cromm
- Re: intrinsic advantage of Latin alphabet over bopomofo (for Chinese)??
- Prev by Date: Re: intrinsic advantage of Latin alphabet over bopomofo (for Chinese)??
- Next by Date: Re: intrinsic advantage of Latin alphabet over bopomofo (for Chinese)??
- Previous by thread: Re: intrinsic advantage of Latin alphabet over bopomofo (for Chinese)??
- Next by thread: Re: intrinsic advantage of Latin alphabet over bopomofo (for Chinese)??
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|