Re: intrinsic advantage of Latin alphabet over bopomofo (for Chinese)??
- From: LEE Sau Dan <danlee@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 05 Apr 2007 22:37:13 +0800
"Paul" == Paul J Kriha <paul.nospam.kriha@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
>> By using a German driving school car. I forgot to give this
>> "spitzfindige" answer. Those cars have an extra set of pedals
>> on the passenger side.
I learnt driving which such a car. It's not a complete set of
controls. Just the clutch and the brake.
Paul> My ex frequently managed to drive me mad while sitting in
Paul> the passenger seat. pjk
It is you, not the car, which is being driven! :)
--
Lee Sau Dan 李守敦 ~{@nJX6X~}
E-mail: danlee@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Home page: http://www.informatik.uni-freiburg.de/~danlee
.
- References:
- Re: intrinsic advantage of Latin alphabet over bopomofo (for Chinese)??
- From: Oliver Cromm
- Re: intrinsic advantage of Latin alphabet over bopomofo (for Chinese)??
- From: Paul J Kriha
- Re: intrinsic advantage of Latin alphabet over bopomofo (for Chinese)??
- Prev by Date: Re: Khoisan is very old
- Next by Date: Re: Khoisan is very old
- Previous by thread: Re: intrinsic advantage of Latin alphabet over bopomofo (for Chinese)??
- Next by thread: Re: intrinsic advantage of Latin alphabet over bopomofo (for Chinese)??
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|