Re: Armenian, Sumerian, Burushaski, and Turkic languages

On May 22, 6:37 am, Darkstar <darkstar...@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
This short, preliminary web article consists of two main parts: (1) a
table of cognates apparently found within certain languages of Central
Asia and the Middle East, and (2) the discussion of the mechanism
which could explain why languages located so far apart could possibly
have anything in common with each other. Since the matter is highly
controversial, there are no conclusions.

http://www.geocities.com/indo_european_geography/Central_Asian_cognat...

Has anyone found any mistakes or inconsistencies in this work, and
if, not how would you see or explain the possible relation among these
languages?

.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: A China-Sumer connection
    ... >> Not only SE Asia, ... what probably makes me open to the idea of languages ... > anything I've read since on the matter. ... but you won't find responsible reference works ...
    (sci.archaeology)
  • Re: A China-Sumer connection
    ... >> Not only SE Asia, ... what probably makes me open to the idea of languages ... > anything I've read since on the matter. ... but you won't find responsible reference works ...
    (sci.anthropology)
  • Re: A China-Sumer connection
    ... >> Not only SE Asia, ... what probably makes me open to the idea of languages ... > anything I've read since on the matter. ... but you won't find responsible reference works ...
    (sci.lang)
  • Re: A China-Sumer connection
    ... >> Not only SE Asia, ... Most languages come in easily recognizable families. ... Basque as a small language family (consisting of Western ... (Gipuzkoan/Lapurdian/High Navarrese/Low Navarrese/Euskara ...
    (sci.archaeology)
  • Re: A China-Sumer connection
    ... >> Not only SE Asia, ... Most languages come in easily recognizable families. ... Basque as a small language family (consisting of Western ... (Gipuzkoan/Lapurdian/High Navarrese/Low Navarrese/Euskara ...
    (sci.anthropology)