Re: Armenian, Sumerian, Burushaski, and Turkic languages
- From: Darkstar <darkstar100@xxxxxxxx>
- Date: 24 May 2007 15:21:43 -0700
On May 24, 10:40 pm, Nathan Sanders <nsand...@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
In article <1180027614.823798.178...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
Darkstar <darkstar...@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
On May 22, 6:37 am, Darkstar <darkstar...@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
This short, preliminary web article consists of two main parts: (1) a
table of cognates apparently found within certain languages of Central
Asia and the Middle East, and (2) the discussion of the mechanism
which could explain why languages located so far apart could possibly
have anything in common with each other. Since the matter is highly
controversial, there are no conclusions.
http://www.geocities.com/indo_european_geography/Central_Asian_cognat...
Has anyone found any mistakes or inconsistencies in this work, and
Lack of systematic correspondence.
You mean "colors" don't look convincing? One would need something like
*A = *B = *C?
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Armenian, Sumerian, Burushaski, and Turkic languages
- From: Nathan Sanders
- Re: Armenian, Sumerian, Burushaski, and Turkic languages
- References:
- Armenian, Sumerian, Burushaski, and Turkic languages
- From: Darkstar
- Re: Armenian, Sumerian, Burushaski, and Turkic languages
- From: Darkstar
- Re: Armenian, Sumerian, Burushaski, and Turkic languages
- From: Nathan Sanders
- Armenian, Sumerian, Burushaski, and Turkic languages
- Prev by Date: Re: Armenian, Sumerian, Burushaski, and Turkic languages
- Next by Date: Re: translation E-GE "tie winners"
- Previous by thread: Re: Armenian, Sumerian, Burushaski, and Turkic languages
- Next by thread: Re: Armenian, Sumerian, Burushaski, and Turkic languages
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|