Re: Marginale phonemes in Finnish
- From: "Peter T. Daniels" <grammatim@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 28 May 2007 08:16:02 -0700
On May 28, 10:22 am, phogl...@xxxxxx wrote:
On 28 touko, 14:26, "Peter T. Daniels" <gramma...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
What's the evidence that they should be phonemicized as /V~/ rather
than /Vn/ ?
Days ago, I changed that to /VN/.
As I noted elsewhere: AFAIK they can be realized either as [Vn] or as
[VN], i.e. there is no n ~ N opposition. I would say that
phonemicizing this sort of thing as nasal vowel is at least
convenient..-
Since there is no doubt that /N/ is required in the system, what
justification is there for using /V~/ instead of /VN/ ?
The following:
- The choice of n versus N does not affect the meaning (there is no
opposition)
Excuse me? Are you even less familiar with German than with English?
singen /ziN@n/
sinnen /zin@n/
- Using pure nasal vowel is one possible phonetic realization in
addition to Vn and VN.-
No one has _yet_ shown a phonemic contrast between nasalized vowel and
vowel followed by nasal consonant.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Marginale phonemes in Finnish
- From: A R:nen
- Re: Marginale phonemes in Finnish
- From: Ruud Harmsen
- Re: Marginale phonemes in Finnish
- From: Joachim Pense
- Re: Marginale phonemes in Finnish
- References:
- Re: Marginale phonemes in Finnish
- From: phoglund
- Re: Marginale phonemes in Finnish
- From: Peter T. Daniels
- Re: Marginale phonemes in Finnish
- From: phoglund
- Re: Marginale phonemes in Finnish
- From: Peter T. Daniels
- Re: Marginale phonemes in Finnish
- From: phoglund
- Re: Marginale phonemes in Finnish
- Prev by Date: Re: Armenian, Sumerian, Burushaski, and Turkic languages
- Next by Date: Re: Armenian, Sumerian, Burushaski, and Turkic languages
- Previous by thread: Re: Marginale phonemes in Finnish
- Next by thread: Re: Marginale phonemes in Finnish
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|