Re: Armenian, Sumerian, Burushaski, and Turkic languages

In article <1181842100.838942.23400@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
Franz Gnaedinger <frgn@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

On Jun 14, 6:43 pm, "Peter T. Daniels" <gramma...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

They are highly informed hypotheses based on reams of data.

With the flaw that the possibility of compounds
has not yet been considered,

Repeating this lie only demonstrates that you have done no actual
research and are only concerned with self-promotion of your personal
fantasies.

If you want to critique commonly accepted methodology, then you need
to critique it for what it actually is, not for what you imagine it to
be.

Nathan

--
Nathan Sanders
Linguistics Program
Williams College
http://wso.williams.edu/~nsanders/
.