Re: Indo-European Languages and Gramatical Gender Loss
- From: Xabi <jserrab@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2007 17:56:43 -0700
On Jun 15, 10:17 am, Seán O'Leathlóbhair <jwlaw...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
I picked 50/50 to be fair to French since that is the best case for
it. Note also the "approximately" as an admission that I was not
claiming precision. As the split moves away from 50/50, the chance of
two randomly selected nouns have different gender decreases though not
very rapidly until the split is quite far from 50/50. If masculine
out numbered feminine by 2 to 1 then the probably of different gender
drops to 4/9 and at 3 to 1 it drops to 5/8.
Maybe there is a typo in the last sentence? Just curious: the last
fraction doesn't seem to drop.
Javi
who would exchange my 4/9 of $1000 for your 5/8 of $1000.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Indo-European Languages and Gramatical Gender Loss
- From: Seán O'Leathlóbhair
- Re: Indo-European Languages and Gramatical Gender Loss
- References:
- Indo-European Languages and Gramatical Gender Loss
- From: Suaprazzodi
- Re: Indo-European Languages and Gramatical Gender Loss
- From: Peter T. Daniels
- Re: Indo-European Languages and Gramatical Gender Loss
- From: Christian Weisgerber
- Re: Indo-European Languages and Gramatical Gender Loss
- From: Seán O'Leathlóbhair
- Re: Indo-European Languages and Gramatical Gender Loss
- From: LEE Sau Dan
- Re: Indo-European Languages and Gramatical Gender Loss
- From: Seán O'Leathlóbhair
- Indo-European Languages and Gramatical Gender Loss
- Prev by Date: Re: Indo-European Languages and Gramatical Gender Loss
- Next by Date: Re: Indo-European Languages and Gramatical Gender Loss
- Previous by thread: Re: Indo-European Languages and Gramatical Gender Loss
- Next by thread: Re: Indo-European Languages and Gramatical Gender Loss
- Index(es):