Re: Ancient writing systems
- From: "Peter T. Daniels" <grammatim@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2007 19:37:10 -0700
On Jun 15, 6:03 pm, "Peter T. Daniels" <gramma...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Here's how Phil Baldi answered the query just now:
# hi peter----i think the standard position that they are not separate
# phonemes stands, and that the volvit/voluit opposition can be
# handled sylabically.
#
# i usually rely on ws allen for stuff like this, but i loaned my
copy
# to a student and it was never returned. niedermann is even better-
The relevant passage in W. S. Allen, Vox Latina, pp. 37-42, is much
too long to copy out. Here are relevant extracts:
"the difference between vowel and semivowel being simply that the
former stands at the nucleus and the latter at the margin of a
syllable." (38)
"The close connexion between the vowel and consonant sounds of _i_ in
Latin is also seen in the occasional poetic interchange of their
functions -- e.g. on the one hand quadrisyllabic _I:ulius_ and on the
other trisyllabic _abiete_ (with i-consonant 'making position'); note
also the variation between consonantal function in _iam_ and vocalic
function in _etiam_. (38)
"In the interior of a word, this sound rarely occurred singly between
vowels. Where once it had been present, it was lost prehistorically
(thus Latin _tre:s_ beside Sanskrit _trayas_). With a few exceptions
noted below, wherever a single, intervocalic consonant is written, it
stands for a _double_ consonant, i.e. [yy]." [Evidence: quotations
from grammarians; development in Italian; metrics; derivational
morphology] (38f.)
"The fact that Latin orthography normally writes only a single _i_ in
such cases is hardly surprising, since it is redundant to write the
double letter where, as in Latin, there is no contrast between single
and double." [Compare _reicit_ [reyyikit] with _reice_ [reyke]] (39)
"The close connection between the vowel and the consonant in Latin is
seen in occasional poetic interchange of function, as, for example,
trisyllabic _silua_ and disyllabic _genua_ (with consonantal _u_
'making position')" (40f.)
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Ancient writing systems
- From: Richard Wordingham
- Re: Ancient writing systems
- From: Douglas G. Kilday
- Re: Ancient writing systems
- References:
- Re: Ancient writing systems
- From: Douglas G. Kilday
- Re: Ancient writing systems
- From: António Marques
- Re: Ancient writing systems
- From: Douglas G. Kilday
- Re: Ancient writing systems
- From: António Marques
- Re: Ancient writing systems
- From: Peter T. Daniels
- Re: Ancient writing systems
- Prev by Date: Re: Indo-European Languages and Gramatical Gender Loss
- Next by Date: Re: Indo-European Languages and Gramatical Gender Loss
- Previous by thread: Re: Ancient writing systems
- Next by thread: Re: Ancient writing systems
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|