Re: Indo-European Languages and Gramatical Gender Loss
- From: "Peter T. Daniels" <grammatim@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2007 06:16:25 -0700
On Jun 25, 1:06 am, "John Atkinson" <johna...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
"Peter T. Daniels" <gramma...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote...
On Jun 13, 9:42 pm, "John Atkinson" <johna...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:[...]
"Peter T. Daniels" <gramma...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote...
On Jun 13, 2:43 pm, Suaprazz...@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
Is there a need for gramatical gender? What is the difference
between
case and gender? Isn't gender in the Bantu languages just another
form of case markings?
Case marks syntactic functions in a clause. Gender marks
coreference
of phrase components.
[...]
My point was
that case and gender typically work on different levels of structure.
Bantu gender markers (i.e. classifiers) have
nothing to do with case.
And, what's more, no Bantu language I know of has any case markings
at
all on NPs.
All right, I don't know it all. Looking at an article by Pascale
Haderman just now on a completely different subject, I came across the
following in a footnote:
"Notons qu'en bodo [a Bantu language of NE Zaire] l'objet est toujours
marque' par la pre'sence d'un ton haut sur le pre'fixe."
Do you want to take that as a "case marking"?
.
- References:
- Indo-European Languages and Gramatical Gender Loss
- From: Suaprazzodi
- Re: Indo-European Languages and Gramatical Gender Loss
- From: Peter T. Daniels
- Re: Indo-European Languages and Gramatical Gender Loss
- From: Christian Weisgerber
- Re: Indo-European Languages and Gramatical Gender Loss
- From: Peter T. Daniels
- Re: Indo-European Languages and Gramatical Gender Loss
- From: Suaprazzodi
- Re: Indo-European Languages and Gramatical Gender Loss
- From: Peter T. Daniels
- Re: Indo-European Languages and Gramatical Gender Loss
- From: John Atkinson
- Re: Indo-European Languages and Gramatical Gender Loss
- From: Peter T. Daniels
- Re: Indo-European Languages and Gramatical Gender Loss
- From: John Atkinson
- Indo-European Languages and Gramatical Gender Loss
- Prev by Date: Re: Dust-sucker [Was: Re: Armenian, Sumerian, Burushaski, and Turkic languages]
- Next by Date: Re: AmE just solution/gist in time
- Previous by thread: Re: Indo-European Languages and Gramatical Gender Loss
- Next by thread: Re: Indo-European Languages and Gramatical Gender Loss
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|