Re: Ancient writing systems
- From: Joachim Pense <snob@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2007 18:25:45 +0200
Am Mon, 25 Jun 2007 12:22:50 +0100 schrieb António Marques:
It would all be so much easier if you had choosen to write a piece
laying out your case, one argument at a time and each stripped of
circularity, and then conclude that your interpretation seems to be the
most economical explanation for it all. (You may think you've done that,
but you haven't.)
I don't think this is easy in a discussion in which PTD is involved.
Joachim
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Ancient writing systems
- From: António Marques
- Re: Ancient writing systems
- From: Peter T. Daniels
- Re: Ancient writing systems
- References:
- Re: Ancient writing systems
- From: Douglas G. Kilday
- Re: Ancient writing systems
- From: António Marques
- Re: Ancient writing systems
- From: Douglas G. Kilday
- Re: Ancient writing systems
- From: António Marques
- Re: Ancient writing systems
- From: Douglas G. Kilday
- Re: Ancient writing systems
- From: António Marques
- Re: Ancient writing systems
- From: Douglas G. Kilday
- Re: Ancient writing systems
- From: António Marques
- Re: Ancient writing systems
- Prev by Date: Re: Dust-sucker [Was: Re: Armenian, Sumerian, Burushaski, and Turkic languages]
- Next by Date: Re: Dust-sucker [Was: Re: Armenian, Sumerian, Burushaski, and Turkic languages]
- Previous by thread: Re: Ancient writing systems
- Next by thread: Re: Ancient writing systems
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading