Re: Ancient writing systems
- From: "Peter T. Daniels" <grammatim@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2007 10:41:01 -0700
On Jun 25, 12:25 pm, Joachim Pense <s...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Am Mon, 25 Jun 2007 12:22:50 +0100 schrieb António Marques:
It would all be so much easier if you had choosen to write a piece
laying out your case, one argument at a time and each stripped of
circularity, and then conclude that your interpretation seems to be the
most economical explanation for it all. (You may think you've done that,
but you haven't.)
I don't think this is easy in a discussion in which PTD is involved.
Maybe if someone would _try_ making a proper argument, instead of
piling on datum after datum with no hint of what they're supposed to
suggest, the argument could be evaluated.
.
- References:
- Re: Ancient writing systems
- From: Douglas G. Kilday
- Re: Ancient writing systems
- From: António Marques
- Re: Ancient writing systems
- From: Douglas G. Kilday
- Re: Ancient writing systems
- From: António Marques
- Re: Ancient writing systems
- From: Douglas G. Kilday
- Re: Ancient writing systems
- From: António Marques
- Re: Ancient writing systems
- From: Douglas G. Kilday
- Re: Ancient writing systems
- From: António Marques
- Re: Ancient writing systems
- From: Joachim Pense
- Re: Ancient writing systems
- Prev by Date: Re: AmE just solution/gist in time
- Next by Date: Re: Dust-sucker [Was: Re: Armenian, Sumerian, Burushaski, and Turkic languages]
- Previous by thread: Re: Ancient writing systems
- Next by thread: Re: Ancient writing systems
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|