Re: Ancient writing systems

Joachim Pense wrote:
Am Mon, 25 Jun 2007 12:22:50 +0100 schrieb António Marques:

It would all be so much easier if you had choosen to write a piece laying out your case, one argument at a time and each stripped of circularity, and then conclude that your interpretation seems to be the most economical explanation for it all. (You may think you've done that, but you haven't.)

I don't think this is easy in a discussion in which PTD is involved.

I think this should have been done before PTD or any other person for that matter became 'involved'.

--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Ancient writing systems
    ... laying out your case, one argument at a time and each stripped of circularity, and then conclude that your interpretation seems to be the most economical explanation for it all. ... I think this should have been done before PTD or any other person for that matter became 'involved'. ...
    (sci.lang)
  • Re: Ancient writing systems
    ... laying out your case, one argument at a time and each stripped of ... circularity, and then conclude that your interpretation seems to be the ... most economical explanation for it all. ...
    (sci.lang)
  • Re: Ancient writing systems
    ... circularity, and then conclude that your interpretation seems to be the ... most economical explanation for it all. ... I don't think this is easy in a discussion in which PTD is involved. ...
    (sci.lang)
  • Re: Ancient writing systems
    ... laying out your case, one argument at a time and each stripped of ... and then conclude that your interpretation seems to be the ... most economical explanation for it all. ... I don't think this is easy in a discussion in which PTD is involved. ...
    (sci.lang)