Re: Armenian, Sumerian, Burushaski, and Turkic languages
- From: "Peter T. Daniels" <grammatim@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2007 06:18:20 -0700
On Jun 26, 8:26 am, Franz Gnaedinger <f...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
My initial point was that even short words can be
derivates of compounds. This realeased a torrent
of invectives. Yet my opponents - Prof. Dr. Nathan
Sanders, professor Brian M. Scott, and Peter T.
Daniels who gave invited lectures in five continents -
???????? North America, Europe, Asia.
could not invalidate my point. Arguments are stronger
than invectives (and killrating campaigns).
Franz Gnaedinger
Killrating my message does not change the fact
that Nathan Sanders, Brian M. Scott, and Peter
T. Daniels could not invalidate my point. Invectives
and killrating testify to a lack of arguments and to
barren minds taking revenge.-
Just because you don't understand that your point is invalid doesn't
mean that it isn't.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Armenian, Sumerian, Burushaski, and Turkic languages
- From: Franz Gnaedinger
- Re: Armenian, Sumerian, Burushaski, and Turkic languages
- From: Darkstar
- Re: Armenian, Sumerian, Burushaski, and Turkic languages
- References:
- Re: Armenian, Sumerian, Burushaski, and Turkic languages
- From: Franz Gnaedinger
- Re: Armenian, Sumerian, Burushaski, and Turkic languages
- From: Franz Gnaedinger
- Re: Armenian, Sumerian, Burushaski, and Turkic languages
- Prev by Date: Re: Dust-sucker [Was: Re: Armenian, Sumerian, Burushaski, and Turkic languages]
- Next by Date: Re: Linguist/Consultant Needed
- Previous by thread: Re: Armenian, Sumerian, Burushaski, and Turkic languages
- Next by thread: Re: Armenian, Sumerian, Burushaski, and Turkic languages
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|