Re: Armenian, Sumerian, Burushaski, and Turkic languages

On Jun 27, 3:16 am, Franz Gnaedinger <f...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Jun 26, 3:18 pm, "Peter T. Daniels" <gramma...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

On Jun 26, 8:26 am, Franz Gnaedinger <f...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

My initial point was that even short words can be
derivates of compounds. This realeased a torrent
of invectives. Yet my opponents - Prof. Dr. Nathan
Sanders, professor Brian M. Scott, and Peter T.
Daniels who gave invited lectures in five continents -

???????? North America, Europe, Asia.

In three continents, then.

could not invalidate my point. Arguments are stronger
than invectives (and killrating campaigns).

Franz Gnaedinger

Killrating my message does not change the fact
that Nathan Sanders, Brian M. Scott, and Peter
T. Daniels could not invalidate my point. Invectives
and killrating testify to a lack of arguments and to
barren minds taking revenge.-

Just because you don't understand that your point is invalid doesn't
mean that it isn't.

My initial point was that even short words can be
derivates of figurative compounds. You could not
invalidate this point. I made my point using arguments,
while the threesome of you - Prof. Dr. Nathan Sanders,
professor Brian M. Scott, and you who gave invited
lectures in three continents - fought with invectives.
Meanwhile I even showed that a short word such as
Latin sol - and therefore also English sun - could be
a derivate of a figurative compound. You can't rule
out this possibility, neither spouting invectives, as
previously, nor dropping an a priori, as above,
nor will the assistance of the killrating mob of
sci.lang help you. The possibility exists that also
short words can be derivates of figurative compounds,
and this will change the Comparative Method. You
can't assume any longer that PIE roots such as
*saH2ul for sun are semantic units, indivisible last
elements of meaning, so to say atoms of meaning.

As long as you fail to understand the difference between "could have
been" and "was," there is no hope for you and no point in reading
anything you write.

.

Relevant Pages