Re: Subtitutes for English /T/ and /D/
- From: garabik-news-2005-05@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2007 17:27:17 +0000 (UTC)
Seán O'Leathlóbhair <jwlawler@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
I have often wondered why non-natives use [s] and [z] or [t] and [d]
but many natives use [f] and [v]. [s] and [z] or [t] and [d] mark you
as non-native but [f] and [v] might not.
Maybe because they were formally taught the way of pronouncing the
consonants with the tongue touching the teeth, and failing that, [t] [d] or
[s] [z] are close, while [f] and [v] are pronounced radically differently.
Orthography also plays a rôle (at least for [t] [d]).
Incidentally, I observed several times when people having no knowledge of
English at all tried to repeat some English words (without seeing them
written down) and came up with [f] or [v] instead.
--
-----------------------------------------------------------
| Radovan Garabík http://kassiopeia.juls.savba.sk/~garabik/ |
| __..--^^^--..__ garabik @ kassiopeia.juls.savba.sk |
-----------------------------------------------------------
Antivirus alert: file .signature infected by signature virus.
Hi! I'm a signature virus! Copy me into your signature file to help me spread!
.
- References:
- Subtitutes for English /T/ and /D/
- From: Ruud Harmsen
- Re: Subtitutes for English /T/ and /D/
- From: phoglund
- Re: Subtitutes for English /T/ and /D/
- From: John Atkinson
- Re: Subtitutes for English /T/ and /D/
- From: Seán O'Leathlóbhair
- Subtitutes for English /T/ and /D/
- Prev by Date: Q: Grammar of Ancient Greek
- Next by Date: Re: English as a creole.
- Previous by thread: Re: Subtitutes for English /T/ and /D/
- Next by thread: Re: Subtitutes for English /T/ and /D/
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|