Re: Subtitutes for English /T/ and /D/
- From: Ruud Harmsen <realemailonsite@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2007 07:59:59 +0200
Sun, 22 Jul 2007 14:46:37 -0700: "Peter T. Daniels"
<grammatim@xxxxxxxxxxx>: in sci.lang:
Either there is a phonemic distinction in some idiolect, or there
isn't. There's no indeterminacy. Absolutely. Ever. No way. Nohow.
It's just not logical in the light of historical change. No such
change is abrupt. So there just cannot be absolute and sudden
transitions without a transition period. Not even in the speech of one
person, in his personal ideolect.
Anyone with a sense of logic can see that. Those who can't just cannot
be helped.
--
Ruud Harmsen
http://rudhar.com
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Subtitutes for English /T/ and /D/
- From: Peter T. Daniels
- Re: Subtitutes for English /T/ and /D/
- References:
- Re: Subtitutes for English /T/ and /D/
- From: Nathan Sanders
- Re: Subtitutes for English /T/ and /D/
- From: Ruud Harmsen
- Re: Subtitutes for English /T/ and /D/
- From: Nathan Sanders
- Re: Subtitutes for English /T/ and /D/
- From: Ruud Harmsen
- Re: Subtitutes for English /T/ and /D/
- From: Peter T. Daniels
- Re: Subtitutes for English /T/ and /D/
- From: Ruud Harmsen
- Re: Subtitutes for English /T/ and /D/
- From: Peter T. Daniels
- Re: Subtitutes for English /T/ and /D/
- From: Ruud Harmsen
- Re: Subtitutes for English /T/ and /D/
- From: Peter T. Daniels
- Re: Subtitutes for English /T/ and /D/
- Prev by Date: Re: Subtitutes for English /T/ and /D/
- Next by Date: Re: Subtitutes for English /T/ and /D/
- Previous by thread: Re: Subtitutes for English /T/ and /D/
- Next by thread: Re: Subtitutes for English /T/ and /D/
- Index(es):
Loading