Re: Are "semi-creoles" widespread?
- From: Darkstar <darkstar100@xxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2007 09:45:45 -0700
On Aug 30, 6:11 pm, na...@xxxxxxxxxxxx (Christian Weisgerber) wrote:
Nathan Sanders <nsand...@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Perhaps once you consult such a grammar textbook (not that anyone
expects you to actually do so), you'll discover that progressive and
continuous are aspects, not tenses.
It used to be called "continuous form <of such and such tense>"
when I learned English in school. I don't think I ever heard
"aspect" as a grammatical term before encountering Russian.
That's why I initially used the term "Tense". I couldn't remember the
correct name for it, but "Aspect" would prbbly be correct. Or just
Progressive.
Constructions like "keep doing smt" are normally called an ing-form
with no special name, ASFAIK.
Here's your progressive/continuous "want", in perfectly normal English:
We've all been wanting you to do actual research in
linguistics, but you continue to disappoint us.
Thanks. "They'll be wanting..." also comes to mind, now that I
think about it.
"am wanting" gets over half a million Google hits
"is wanting" gets almost a million
"are wanting" gets more than a million and a half
"was/were wanting" together are just over a million
"been wanting" is at two million
"be wanting" is almost at a million
So we have a grand total of around *seven million* hits for the
progressive of "wanting",
Er, we all understand that the numbers Google shows are "estimates"
and are frequently overestimated by an order of magnitude or
two--right? Also, some of these hits are bound to refer to the
adjective "wanting".
They're only good as a ratio, when comparing A to B. Relative, not
absolute values!
But, yes, I'm stunned at what "I am wanting" turns up. I would
have considered usages such as "I am wanting to register a domain
name" to be ungrammatical. Normally my intuitions about English
grammar aren't that far off. What's going on here?
Are you a native speaker of German?
.
- References:
- Are "semi-creoles" widespread?
- From: Darkstar
- Re: Are "semi-creoles" widespread?
- From: Harlan Messinger
- Re: Are "semi-creoles" widespread?
- From: Darkstar
- Re: Are "semi-creoles" widespread?
- From: Nathan Sanders
- Re: Are "semi-creoles" widespread?
- From: Christian Weisgerber
- Are "semi-creoles" widespread?
- Prev by Date: Re: Are "semi-creoles" widespread?
- Next by Date: Re: Are "semi-creoles" widespread?
- Previous by thread: Re: Are "semi-creoles" widespread?
- Next by thread: Re: Are "semi-creoles" widespread?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|