Re: Are "semi-creoles" widespread?
- From: "Brian M. Scott" <b.scott@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2007 13:12:31 -0400
On Thu, 30 Aug 2007 00:02:48 -0700, Darkstar
<darkstar100@xxxxxxxx> wrote in
<news:1188457368.390504.5300@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
in sci.lang:
[...]
You seem to be very interested in arguing about minutiae
and looking for other people's faults.
There's nothing to argue about: I'm simply pointing out your
errors.
Do you know anything about pidgins/creoles and their
development?
I know the basics. In particular, I know what they are,
which is clearly more than you do.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Are "semi-creoles" widespread?
- From: Darkstar
- Re: Are "semi-creoles" widespread?
- References:
- Are "semi-creoles" widespread?
- From: Darkstar
- Re: Are "semi-creoles" widespread?
- From: LEE Sau Dan
- Re: Are "semi-creoles" widespread?
- From: Richard Wordingham
- Re: Are "semi-creoles" widespread?
- From: Darkstar
- Re: Are "semi-creoles" widespread?
- From: LEE Sau Dan
- Re: Are "semi-creoles" widespread?
- From: Darkstar
- Re: Are "semi-creoles" widespread?
- From: Harlan Messinger
- Re: Are "semi-creoles" widespread?
- From: Darkstar
- Re: Are "semi-creoles" widespread?
- From: Nathan Sanders
- Re: Are "semi-creoles" widespread?
- From: Darkstar
- Re: Are "semi-creoles" widespread?
- From: Nathan Sanders
- Re: Are "semi-creoles" widespread?
- From: Darkstar
- Re: Are "semi-creoles" widespread?
- From: Brian M. Scott
- Re: Are "semi-creoles" widespread?
- From: Darkstar
- Are "semi-creoles" widespread?
- Prev by Date: Re: Are "semi-creoles" widespread?
- Next by Date: Re: Are "semi-creoles" widespread?
- Previous by thread: Re: Are "semi-creoles" widespread?
- Next by thread: Re: Are "semi-creoles" widespread?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|