Re: Fr/lat/ru tu-vous/tu-vos/ - : etymology ?
- From: "Brian M. Scott" <b.scott@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 7 Oct 2007 12:34:11 -0400
On Sun, 07 Oct 2007 05:45:34 -0700, "Peter T. Daniels"
<grammatim@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in
<news:1191761134.574734.293140@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
in sci.lang:
On Oct 7, 2:18 am, "Brian M. Scott" <b.sc...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Sat, 06 Oct 2007 23:10:20 -0700, "Peter T. Daniels"
<gramma...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in
<news:1191737420.867869.256980@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
in sci.lang:
On Oct 7, 12:07 am, "Brian M. Scott" <b.sc...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Thu, 04 Oct 2007 05:31:34 GMT, John Atkinson
<johna...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in
<news:WU_Mi.4898$H22.452@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> in
sci.lang:
[...]
This is common in eye-dialect -- like <was> being spelled
<woz> to indicate a speaker of non-standard English, even
though <was> and <woz> are pronounced exactly the same
in all varieties of English.
Not true: many (most?) Americans have [wVz] for stressed
<was> and [wAz] for <woz>.
What does that mean? <woz> doesn't represent a word of
Standard English, so Americans don't have any
pronunciation "for" it.
Piffle. Ask a literate American how to pronounce the
nonsense word <woz>; the odds that he will rhyme it with
<Oz> are excellent.
You claimed that <woz> represents something other than "stressed
<was>."
I said that it would most likely be pronounced differently
from stressed <was>. This is true.
If anything is going to be respelled, it's either
_unstressed_ "was" or the stressed nonstandard [wvz] both
= <wuz>
This has nothing to do with my statement, which is *not*
about <woz> as a respelling of <was>.
Brian
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Fr/lat/ru tu-vous/tu-vos/ - : etymology ?
- From: Peter T. Daniels
- Re: Fr/lat/ru tu-vous/tu-vos/ - : etymology ?
- References:
- Re: Fr/lat/ru tu-vous/tu-vos/ - : etymology ?
- From: Aidan Kehoe
- Re: Fr/lat/ru tu-vous/tu-vos/ - : etymology ?
- From: Franz Gnaedinger
- Re: Fr/lat/ru tu-vous/tu-vos/ - : etymology ?
- From: Peter T. Daniels
- Re: Fr/lat/ru tu-vous/tu-vos/ - : etymology ?
- From: Franz Gnaedinger
- Re: Fr/lat/ru tu-vous/tu-vos/ - : etymology ?
- From: John Atkinson
- Re: Fr/lat/ru tu-vous/tu-vos/ - : etymology ?
- From: Brian M. Scott
- Re: Fr/lat/ru tu-vous/tu-vos/ - : etymology ?
- From: Peter T. Daniels
- Re: Fr/lat/ru tu-vous/tu-vos/ - : etymology ?
- From: Brian M. Scott
- Re: Fr/lat/ru tu-vous/tu-vos/ - : etymology ?
- From: Peter T. Daniels
- Re: Fr/lat/ru tu-vous/tu-vos/ - : etymology ?
- Prev by Date: Re: OT: Constitutional issues [Was: Re: How to prime kids to learn 3+ languages?]
- Next by Date: Re: OT: Constitutional issues [Was: Re: How to prime kids to learn 3+ languages?]
- Previous by thread: Re: Fr/lat/ru tu-vous/tu-vos/ - : etymology ?
- Next by thread: Re: Fr/lat/ru tu-vous/tu-vos/ - : etymology ?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|