Re: Fr/lat/ru tu-vous/tu-vos/ - : etymology ?
- From: "Brian M. Scott" <b.scott@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 8 Oct 2007 00:29:30 -0400
On Sun, 07 Oct 2007 21:01:12 -0700, "Peter T. Daniels"
<grammatim@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in
<news:1191816072.782792.112310@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
in sci.lang:
On Oct 7, 10:35 pm, "Brian M. Scott" <b.sc...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Sun, 07 Oct 2007 14:00:29 -0700, "Peter T. Daniels"
<gramma...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in
<news:1191790829.370603.23110@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
in sci.lang:
On Oct 7, 3:49 pm, "Brian M. Scott" <b.sc...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Sun, 07 Oct 2007 12:18:42 -0700, "Peter T. Daniels"
<gramma...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in
<news:1191784722.180511.321930@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
in sci.lang:
[...]
You're mad, sir. "Was" and "Oz" are a perfect rhyme.
(Whatever symbol you choose to use to represent the
vowel.)
They aren't. It isn't the Wizard of Uz. It *is* 'we wuz
robbed'.
Maybe in rural outskirts of Cleveland.
I rather doubt that Joe Jacobs grew up in the rural
outskirts of Cleveland.
Who?
Max Schmeling's Jewish-American manager, who famously said
'We wuz robbed!'.
M-W has [az] and [w@z, waz] (s.v. be!)
M-W OnLine has, using its symbolism, /'w&z/ and /'wäz/. Its
/&/ represents both [V] and [@] ('\&\ as a and u in abut'),
and stress mark in /'w&z/ suggests that they're talking
about the stressed form of the word: [wVz], then [wAz].
Does the printed version use other symbols, or did you
simply misunderstand them?
AHD3 s.v. <be> gives the vowel as u-breve or o-breve (in
that order) when stressed and as @ when unstressed; this
also is [wVz] or [wAz], with unstressed [w@z].
I retract my earlier statement that no common U.S. variety
has [A]; I do not retract the claim that [V] is common,
quite possibly more common than [A].
Brian
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Fr/lat/ru tu-vous/tu-vos/ - : etymology ?
- From: Peter T. Daniels
- Re: Fr/lat/ru tu-vous/tu-vos/ - : etymology ?
- From: benlizro@xxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Fr/lat/ru tu-vous/tu-vos/ - : etymology ?
- References:
- Re: Fr/lat/ru tu-vous/tu-vos/ - : etymology ?
- From: Aidan Kehoe
- Re: Fr/lat/ru tu-vous/tu-vos/ - : etymology ?
- From: Franz Gnaedinger
- Re: Fr/lat/ru tu-vous/tu-vos/ - : etymology ?
- From: Peter T. Daniels
- Re: Fr/lat/ru tu-vous/tu-vos/ - : etymology ?
- From: Franz Gnaedinger
- Re: Fr/lat/ru tu-vous/tu-vos/ - : etymology ?
- From: John Atkinson
- Re: Fr/lat/ru tu-vous/tu-vos/ - : etymology ?
- From: Brian M. Scott
- Re: Fr/lat/ru tu-vous/tu-vos/ - : etymology ?
- From: Peter T. Daniels
- Re: Fr/lat/ru tu-vous/tu-vos/ - : etymology ?
- From: Brian M. Scott
- Re: Fr/lat/ru tu-vous/tu-vos/ - : etymology ?
- From: Peter T. Daniels
- Re: Fr/lat/ru tu-vous/tu-vos/ - : etymology ?
- From: Brian M. Scott
- Re: Fr/lat/ru tu-vous/tu-vos/ - : etymology ?
- From: Peter T. Daniels
- Re: Fr/lat/ru tu-vous/tu-vos/ - : etymology ?
- From: Brian M. Scott
- Re: Fr/lat/ru tu-vous/tu-vos/ - : etymology ?
- From: Peter T. Daniels
- Re: Fr/lat/ru tu-vous/tu-vos/ - : etymology ?
- From: Brian M. Scott
- Re: Fr/lat/ru tu-vous/tu-vos/ - : etymology ?
- From: Peter T. Daniels
- Re: Fr/lat/ru tu-vous/tu-vos/ - : etymology ?
- From: Brian M. Scott
- Re: Fr/lat/ru tu-vous/tu-vos/ - : etymology ?
- From: Peter T. Daniels
- Re: Fr/lat/ru tu-vous/tu-vos/ - : etymology ?
- Prev by Date: Re: What does gewni mean? (Maltese or Welsh)
- Next by Date: Re: Fr/lat/ru tu-vous/tu-vos/ - : etymology ?
- Previous by thread: Re: Fr/lat/ru tu-vous/tu-vos/ - : etymology ?
- Next by thread: Re: Fr/lat/ru tu-vous/tu-vos/ - : etymology ?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|