Re: as <adjective> as constructions

---

• From: tigger <aj-smith@xxxxxxx>
• Date: Wed, 10 Oct 2007 09:47:27 -0700

---

Sorry, who "dislikes" it?

Hi Peter - re-read my original posting and you will find that it is
fully explained there.

Tigger

.

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: as <adjective> as constructions
    • From: Peter T. Daniels

• References:
  • as <adjective> as constructions
    • From: tigger
  • Re: as <adjective> as constructions
    • From: phoglund
  • Re: as <adjective> as constructions
    • From: Trond Engen
  • Re: as <adjective> as constructions
    • From: Brian M. Scott
  • Re: as <adjective> as constructions
    • From: Trond Engen
  • Re: as <adjective> as constructions
    • From: tigger
  • Re: as <adjective> as constructions
    • From: Peter T. Daniels

• Prev by Date: Re: Chinese character & pinyin frequency analysis
• Next by Date: Re: Chinese character & pinyin frequency analysis
• Previous by thread: Re: as <adjective> as constructions
• Next by thread: Re: as <adjective> as constructions
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

• Windows
• Science
• Usenet

• Archive
• About
• Privacy
• Search
• Imprint

sci.tech-archive.net  > Archive  > sci.lang  > 2007-10