Re: "Evolution" making English irregular verbs regular
- From: "Peter T. Daniels" <grammatim@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 11 Oct 2007 20:17:54 -0700
On Oct 11, 7:23 pm, cph <cph1...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
The irregular verbs, governed by confusing and antiquated rules, came
under evolutionary pressure to obey the modern "-ed" rule of regular
verb conjugation, according to a report today in the journal Nature.
[v. 449, 11 Oct 20007, p. 665]
Linguists have constructed elaborate "family trees" showing how
English has developed over time but have been unable to detect the
principle driving irregular verbs toward regularity.
Once again, _Nature_ publishes bull*** about language.
Why don't they have articles on language refereed by linguists?
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: "Evolution" making English irregular verbs regular
- From: Paul J Kriha
- Re: "Evolution" making English irregular verbs regular
- From: benlizross
- Re: "Evolution" making English irregular verbs regular
- References:
- Prev by Date: Re: Chinese character & pinyin frequency analysis
- Next by Date: Re: How to prime kids to learn 3+ languages?
- Previous by thread: "Evolution" making English irregular verbs regular
- Next by thread: Re: "Evolution" making English irregular verbs regular
- Index(es):