Re: In cauda venenum
- From: Harlan Messinger <hmessinger.removethis@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2007 13:07:59 -0400
hag@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
On Thu, 25 Oct 2007 08:50:55 -0400, Harlan Messinger
<hmessinger.removethis@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
hag@xxxxxxxxx wrote:On Wed, 24 Oct 2007 12:02:40 -0400, Harlan MessingerI don't understand what that means. What is "psychological" about not choosing your work for publication? Your persecution complex is showing.
<hmessinger.removethis@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
hag@xxxxxxxxx wrote:Isn't that exatly the psychological method of censorship?Concerning my decipherment of the Phaistos disc, and the disturbances"if you cannot rely on a regular and honest release of an epoch-making discovery,...."
that it brings into a life that such event is not dealt with and
discussed in the normal and expected way in the media by scholars, but
in the contrary has been counteracted and delayed since 1986
http://web.gvdnet.dk/GVD002393/cauda.htm
That's begging the question. Obviously the publishers don't consider what you've submitted epoch-making.
To censor someone is to block his expression, not to decline to assist him in it. Is anybody actively blocking you from expressing yourself?
By the method of ignoarrogancy,
It's arrogant for them to trust their knowledge, experience, and analysis--exactly the way you trust yours? Then what does that say about you?
.
- References:
- In cauda venenum
- From: hag
- Re: In cauda venenum
- From: Harlan Messinger
- Re: In cauda venenum
- From: Harlan Messinger
- In cauda venenum
- Prev by Date: Re: "Pacific" misnomer revisited
- Next by Date: Re: When was Latin Languages supplanted from Dalmatia/Yugoslavia area?
- Previous by thread: Re: In cauda venenum
- Next by thread: Re: In cauda venenum
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|