Re: Greek New Testament is translatiion from Aramaic?
- From: "Peter T. Daniels" <grammatim@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 24 Nov 2007 21:02:49 -0800 (PST)
On Nov 24, 9:22 pm, mb <azyth...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Nov 24, 12:41 pm, phogl...@xxxxxx wrote:
On Nov 24, 9:55 pm, "Peter T. Daniels" <gramma...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:...
If this website has something to say, you can summarize its message.
The gist seems to be, that certain murky passages of the New Testament
make sense, if they are read as inept Greek translations of typically
Semitic poetic constructions and wordplays.
Which we talked about repeatedly.
The opinion of some people that the texts are not a translation is
entirely irrelevant:
1. The Greek is obviously that of L1 Semitic speakers. I'd suggest
that translation on the page or in the mind makes no substantial
difference.
Except, of course, for the definition of "translation."
2. It is just personal opinion (albeit of titled persons): No internal
evidence really points to a first writing in Greek or in Aramaic, one
way or the other.
Merely the _lack_ of evidence of translation from Aramaic to Greek.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Greek New Testament is translatiion from Aramaic?
- From: Ruud Harmsen
- Re: Greek New Testament is translatiion from Aramaic?
- From: mb
- Re: Greek New Testament is translatiion from Aramaic?
- References:
- Greek New Testament is translatiion from Aramaic?
- From: Ruud Harmsen
- Re: Greek New Testament is translatiion from Aramaic?
- From: Peter T. Daniels
- Re: Greek New Testament is translatiion from Aramaic?
- From: phoglund
- Re: Greek New Testament is translatiion from Aramaic?
- From: mb
- Greek New Testament is translatiion from Aramaic?
- Prev by Date: Re: Was the entire Anatolia part of the Persian Empire? --AGGIE
- Next by Date: Re: Greek New Testament is translatiion from Aramaic?
- Previous by thread: Re: Greek New Testament is translatiion from Aramaic?
- Next by thread: Re: Greek New Testament is translatiion from Aramaic?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading