Re: Waradpande seems to have destroyed PIE already
- From: Harlan Messinger <hmessinger.removethis@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 01 Dec 2007 09:07:26 -0500
Franz Gnaedinger wrote:
On Nov 30, 4:12 pm, "Peter T. Daniels" <gramma...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:Finally!!!!! You have admitted that you are not doing science!!!!
Tame your temper, young man. I called my Magdalenian
approach to early language an experiment. Yes, it is an
experiment, and experiments won a place in science.
Experimental archaeology was at first not considered
scientific, now it has a firm place in archaeology.
If so, it's because it was falsifiable and was found to have stood up to the test.
Experimental math-history was not considered scientific
ten years ago,
What the hell is "experimental math-history"? Evidently something else that you've made up. I just Googled the phrase and received just three hits--all of which involve you.
and I was expelled from a math history forum;
So evidently it still isn't considered scientific, so why did you raise it as an example?
by now it is not yet really accepted but I was allowed back
into that forum. Experimental paleo-linguistics is not yet
considered scientific by you
Your exercises aren't experiments.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Waradpande seems to have destroyed PIE already
- From: Franz Gnaedinger
- Re: Waradpande seems to have destroyed PIE already
- References:
- Re: Waradpande seems to have destroyed PIE already
- From: Franz Gnaedinger
- Re: Waradpande seems to have destroyed PIE already
- Prev by Date: Re: Greek New Testament is translatiion from Aramaic?
- Next by Date: Re: Greek New Testament is translatiion from Aramaic?
- Previous by thread: Re: Waradpande seems to have destroyed PIE already
- Next by thread: Re: Waradpande seems to have destroyed PIE already
- Index(es):