Re: Waradpande seems to have destroyed PIE already
- From: Franz Gnaedinger <frgn@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 1 Dec 2007 08:58:02 -0800 (PST)
On Dec 1, 3:07 pm, Harlan Messinger
<hmessinger.removet...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
If so, it's because it was falsifiable and was found to have stood up to
the test.
Very recently I rpoposed a test. I gave an explanation
of words for wolf on the Magdalenian basis that differes
pointedly from the PIE explanations, and asked people
to point out a flaw or an impossibility in my reconstructions.
They gave up, they could not point out a violation of a PIE
sound law in my reconstruction, nor could they point out
a mistake and obvious flaw in my broader understanding
of PIE, much more differentiated in time an space than
the PIE of comparative linguistics. In short: PIE is the
evening red of Magdalenian.
What the hell is "experimental math-history"? Evidently something else
that you've made up. I just Googled the phrase and received just three
hits--all of which involve you.
A term coined by me, and a method proposed and
developed by me.
Your exercises aren't experiments.
My approach to the Ice Age language of Europe _is_
an experiment, as are the experiments of experimental
archaeology.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Waradpande seems to have destroyed PIE already
- From: Peter T. Daniels
- Re: Waradpande seems to have destroyed PIE already
- From: Harlan Messinger
- Re: Waradpande seems to have destroyed PIE already
- References:
- Re: Waradpande seems to have destroyed PIE already
- From: Franz Gnaedinger
- Re: Waradpande seems to have destroyed PIE already
- From: Harlan Messinger
- Re: Waradpande seems to have destroyed PIE already
- Prev by Date: Re: Waradpande seems to have destroyed PIE already
- Next by Date: Re: Greek New Testament is translatiion from Aramaic?
- Previous by thread: Re: Waradpande seems to have destroyed PIE already
- Next by thread: Re: Waradpande seems to have destroyed PIE already
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
