Re: ``Ken and I being on the radio together''
- From: Adam Funk <a24061@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2008 12:15:47 +0000
On 2008-01-21, Peter T. Daniels wrote:
My own theory is that the objective case for non-finite verbs comes from
indirect statement in Latin.
Sorry, English ain't descended from Latin.
No, but it's descended from Old English.
The OED has separate entries for -ing[1], descended from OE -ung,
-ing
1. The original function of the suffix was to form nouns of action;
as ácsung ASKING, from ácsian to ask, ...
2. The most notable development of the vbl. n. in -ing is its use as
a gerund, i.e. a substantive with certain verbal functions,
particularly those of being qualified by an adverb instead of an
adjective, and of governing an object like a verb: e.g. the habit of
speaking loosely (= loose speaking); he has hopes of coming back
speedily (= a speedy return); he practises writing (= the writing
of) leading articles; ...
and -ing[2],
suffix of the present participle, and of adjs. thence derived, or so
formed; an alteration of the original OE. -ende ...
As -inge was the proper ending of the vbl. n. (-ING1), it has
naturally suggested itself to many that the levelling of the
pres. pple. under the same form must have been the result of some
contact or confusion of the functions or constructions of the two
formations. But investigation has discovered no trace of any such
functional or constructional contact in Early ME.; and it is now
generally agreed that the confusion was, in its origin, entirely
phonetic. On the other hand, the fact that the forms had, by the
14th c., become identical, may have been a factor in the development
of the gerundial use of the vbl. n., which began then; and it has
certainly influenced the subsequent development of the compound
gerundial forms being made, having made, having been made, being
about to go, etc., which have the same form as the corresponding
participles (see -ING1 2). The identity of form of pr. pple. and
gerund probably also assisted the process whereby, at a later date,
such a construction as ‘the king went a-hunting’, formerly ‘on or an
huntinge’, was shortened to ‘the king went hunting’, the last word
being then taken as the participle; and thus to the shortening of
‘the ark was a-building’, orig. ‘on building’, to ‘the ark was
building’,---in which, if ‘building’ is taken as a pple., it must
be explained as a pple. pass. = being built. To the same cause must
be ascribed some of the current constructions of the gerund, and the
tendency of the vbl. n. when used attributively to run together with
the pr. pple. used adjectivally, as in cutting tools, a driving
wheel (see -ING1).
--
Bob just used 'canonical' in the canonical way. [Guy Steele]
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: ``Ken and I being on the radio together''
- From: Peter T. Daniels
- Re: ``Ken and I being on the radio together''
- References:
- ``Ken and I being on the radio together''
- From: Ron Hardin
- Re: ``Ken and I being on the radio together''
- From: Bart Mathias
- Re: ``Ken and I being on the radio together''
- From: Richard Wordingham
- Re: ``Ken and I being on the radio together''
- From: Ron Hardin
- Re: ``Ken and I being on the radio together''
- From: Joachim Pense
- Re: ``Ken and I being on the radio together''
- From: Ron Hardin
- Re: ``Ken and I being on the radio together''
- From: Paul J Kriha
- Re: ``Ken and I being on the radio together''
- From: Peter T. Daniels
- ``Ken and I being on the radio together''
- Prev by Date: Re: How about a new lingustic forum?
- Next by Date: Re: How about a new lingustic forum?
- Previous by thread: Re: ``Ken and I being on the radio together''
- Next by thread: Re: ``Ken and I being on the radio together''
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|