Re: Idiot spam attack on sci.lang

On Jan 25, 8:39 am, Franz Gnaedinger <f...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Jan 25, 2:21 pm, Richard Herring <junk@[127.0.0.1]> wrote:



That's because it's unfalsifiable. What does that tell you about your
"approach", considered as a scientific theory?

I always engage in discussions, I even tell people how
to do it: choose the worst I say and nail me on it.

They always do.

I never weasel away,

You always do.

I always stand my man. And
until now I won the discussions.

You never did.

I proposed numerous
reconstructions, daring ones. Nobody can point them
out as wrong.

Of course not. They have no basis in reality, there is nothing to
evaluate them against.

As long as you can't do that, with all
your titles and all your universities and libraries and
connections in your background, as long I feel entitled
to go on with my experiment.

You do not know the meaning of the English word "experiment."

Has anybody suggested otherwise?

They suggest that you stop plaguing us with the results, but "publish"
them in newsgroups where they enjoy discussing such things, such as
conlang newsgroups.

Of course, all the time, they try to send me away,
to conlang or so.

That's because what you are doing is _constructing_ a language.

What is a "Google account", and how do you "fill" it?

If you look up my profile you see a lot of messages
that have not been written and posted by me but by that
criminal who abuses my name and Google identity,
appearing in groups I would never visit. Or look up
"messages by this author": the same crap sent by
the criminal who abuses my name, my own messages
buried under them. Neither does Google remove that
crap from my account, nor can I remove it, and when
I report abuse I get ever the same robot answer.
They have a serious security problem.

Once again: What is a "Google account"?

Usenet in general uses protocols that have no security. How is that
specifically Google's problem?

If Google runs an account of my messages,

Ah. It appears that you don't know the meaning of the English word
"account."

then
they should not allow criminals who abuse my name
and Google identity to fill my account with his crap.
Their robot can always tell me they do their best
in order to improve the groups - when I see my
account filled with crap by a criminal, archived by
Google under my name, I say Google has a problem
and is a part of the present mess, probably owing
to their too fast implementation of ever new features.
They should consolidate what they achieved so far
before adding ever new features.
.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Idiot spam attack on sci.lang
    ... criminal who abuses my name and Google identity, ... the same crap sent by ... What is a "Google account"? ... and all his money he ever deposited be given back to him. ...
    (sci.lang)
  • Re: Idiot spam attack on sci.lang
    ... criminal who abuses my name and Google identity, ... the same crap sent by ... they should not allow criminals who abuse my name ...
    (sci.lang)
  • Re: Idiot spam attack on sci.lang
    ... criminal who abuses my name and Google identity, ... the same crap sent by ... they should not allow criminals who abuse my name ...
    (sci.lang)
  • Re: Idiot spam attack on sci.lang
    ... criminal who abuses my name and Google identity, ... the same crap sent by ... If Google runs an account of my messages, ...
    (sci.lang)
  • Re: Idiot spam attack on sci.lang
    ... criminal who abuses my name and Google identity, ... the same crap sent by ... What is a "Google account"? ...
    (sci.lang)