Re: alternative pronunciations of 'naive'
- From: Nathan Sanders <nsanders@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 28 Jan 2008 00:26:49 -0500
In article
<9c696330-7c1e-4bc2-b23a-63048ec4103b@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
"Peter T. Daniels" <grammatim@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Jan 27, 10:07 pm, sobriquet <dohduh...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Is there a difference between the two alternative pronunciations of
'naive' atwww.m-w.comor did
they erroneously link up an identical audio fragment to both?
Just curious, perhaps I'm not listening carefully enough, but I can't
make out any differences between the two.
Where do you see alternative pronunciations?
It simply gives you a pronunciation that goes with either of the
spellings (with or without dieresis).
They list two pronunciations that, following their transcription, come
out roughly as [nA.iv] and [naI.iv]. I don't think I've ever heard a
native speaker (of English!) use the former, but then again, the
difference is so subtle that I'm not sure I'd notice if I weren't
specifically listening for it.
Nathan
--
Nathan Sanders
Linguistics Program
Williams College
http://wso.williams.edu/~nsanders/
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: alternative pronunciations of 'naive'
- From: Brian M. Scott
- Re: alternative pronunciations of 'naive'
- From: Peter T. Daniels
- Re: alternative pronunciations of 'naive'
- References:
- alternative pronunciations of 'naive'
- From: sobriquet
- Re: alternative pronunciations of 'naive'
- From: Peter T. Daniels
- alternative pronunciations of 'naive'
- Prev by Date: Re: alternative pronunciations of 'naive'
- Next by Date: Re: Who was the real father of Jesus?
- Previous by thread: Re: alternative pronunciations of 'naive'
- Next by thread: Re: alternative pronunciations of 'naive'
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|