Re: alternative pronunciations of 'naive'
- From: "Brian M. Scott" <b.scott@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 28 Jan 2008 11:42:29 -0500
On Mon, 28 Jan 2008 00:26:49 -0500, Nathan Sanders
<nsanders@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in sci.lang:
In article
<9c696330-7c1e-4bc2-b23a-63048ec4103b@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
"Peter T. Daniels" <grammatim@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Jan 27, 10:07 pm, sobriquet <dohduh...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Is there a difference between the two alternative pronunciations of
'naive' atwww.m-w.comor did
they erroneously link up an identical audio fragment to both?
Just curious, perhaps I'm not listening carefully enough, but I can't
make out any differences between the two.
Where do you see alternative pronunciations?
It simply gives you a pronunciation that goes with either of the
spellings (with or without dieresis).
They list two pronunciations that, following their
transcription, come out roughly as [nA.iv] and [naI.iv].
I don't think I've ever heard a native speaker (of
English!) use the former, but then again, the difference
is so subtle that I'm not sure I'd notice if I weren't
specifically listening for it.
I don't think that I've ever heard a native speaker of
English say anything but [nA'i:v] or similar.
Brian
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: alternative pronunciations of 'naive'
- From: Michael Kuettner
- Re: alternative pronunciations of 'naive'
- From: Nathan Sanders
- Re: alternative pronunciations of 'naive'
- References:
- alternative pronunciations of 'naive'
- From: sobriquet
- Re: alternative pronunciations of 'naive'
- From: Peter T. Daniels
- Re: alternative pronunciations of 'naive'
- From: Nathan Sanders
- alternative pronunciations of 'naive'
- Prev by Date: Re: Apes and language
- Next by Date: Re: Apes and language
- Previous by thread: Re: alternative pronunciations of 'naive'
- Next by thread: Re: alternative pronunciations of 'naive'
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|