Re: Idiot spam attack on sci.lang
- From: Adam Funk <a24061@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 1 Feb 2008 20:31:33 +0000
On 2008-02-01, António Marques wrote:
4. Third-party news providers usually cater to binary users also, which
means they don't have (please someone inform me if they do) pricings for
people who just want to use text (in case it wasn't clear before, text
uses almost no resources at all when compared to binaries). Their
pricings are usually per-month or amount of gigabytes, whichever comes
first, which is completely inadequate for me (both in price and number
of times I'd have to perform payments). But teranews does have this
special offering of (limited but enough for me) service for a one-off
fee, and that's what I got.
5. No, I'm not happy with them, but as per (4) I have not yet found an
alternative.
I think news.individual.net is pretty good. It's not free but it's
not expensive (EUR10/year).
--
I worry that 10 or 15 years from now, [my daughter] will come to me
and say 'Daddy, where were you when they took freedom of the press
away from the Internet?' [Mike Godwin, EFF http://www.eff.org/ ]
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Idiot spam attack on sci.lang
- From: Aidan Kehoe
- Re: Idiot spam attack on sci.lang
- From: Joe Fineman
- Re: Idiot spam attack on sci.lang
- References:
- Re: Idiot spam attack on sci.lang
- From: Franz Gnaedinger
- Re: Idiot spam attack on sci.lang
- From: António Marques
- Re: Idiot spam attack on sci.lang
- Prev by Date: Re: Serbian - contemporary of Sanskrit
- Next by Date: Re: What's it called?
- Previous by thread: Re: Idiot spam attack on sci.lang
- Next by thread: Re: Idiot spam attack on sci.lang
- Index(es):