Re: Non-syllabic [Y] ?
- From: "Peter T. Daniels" <grammatim@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2008 13:34:47 -0800 (PST)
On Feb 26, 4:28 pm, "Brian M. Scott" <b.sc...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Tue, 26 Feb 2008 08:54:12 -0800 (PST), <ekk...@xxxxxxxxx>
wrote in
<news:d46991ac-88d1-4ccc-b895-d4edbe0a28cc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
in sci.lang:
On Feb 26, 7:45 am, Nathan Sanders <nsand...@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
In article
<a7ce1237-f473-41cc-8372-f1286d2ab...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
Sonja Elen Kisa <sonj...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
What's the place of articulation for a non-syllabic
(approximant) version of the vowel [Y] (i.e. a
near-close near-front rounded vowel)? Another way to
describe it would be a lax version of the labial-
palatal approximant.
[...]
There is no basic symbol for that sound (upside-down [h]Let me hope Google can display it:
is the symbol for the approximant version of the "tense"
vowel [y]), but you could just put an arch under the
small capital [Y]. The under-arch indicates that the
vowel is not syllabic, which can be interpreted as it
being an approximant instead.
[ʏ̯]
It displayed correctly for me, though it may not show up
properly in this response.
It displayed in both the original message and Brian's copy, except
that the diacritic isn't centered under the letter.
.
- References:
- Non-syllabic [Y] ?
- From: Sonja Elen Kisa
- Re: Non-syllabic [Y] ?
- From: Nathan Sanders
- Re: Non-syllabic [Y] ?
- From: ekkilu
- Re: Non-syllabic [Y] ?
- From: Brian M. Scott
- Non-syllabic [Y] ?
- Prev by Date: Re: Definition of the word Tsiyon ...
- Next by Date: Re: why the -s in English verbs?
- Previous by thread: Re: Non-syllabic [Y] ?
- Next by thread: why the -s in English verbs?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|