Re: why the -s in English verbs?
- From: mb <azythos2@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2008 10:07:46 -0800 (PST)
On Feb 27, 9:10 am, ekk...@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
...
I did not claim it. It's a fact for English: 3Sg is more complicated...
than other persons.
Sure, that's a fact but it does not make 3ps the "*semantically*
unmarked" person.
.
- References:
- why the -s in English verbs?
- From: ekkilu
- Re: why the -s in English verbs?
- From: Joachim Pense
- Re: why the -s in English verbs?
- From: John Atkinson
- Re: why the -s in English verbs?
- From: Joachim Pense
- Re: why the -s in English verbs?
- From: ekkilu
- why the -s in English verbs?
- Prev by Date: Re: new book on the spread of IE
- Next by Date: Re: new book on the spread of IE
- Previous by thread: Re: why the -s in English verbs?
- Next by thread: Re: why the -s in English verbs?
- Index(es):
