Re: why the -s in English verbs?
- From: "Brian M. Scott" <b.scott@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 29 Feb 2008 15:08:54 -0500
On Fri, 29 Feb 2008 10:58:39 +0100, Trond Engen
<trondnet@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in
<news:47c7d800$0$14991$8404b019@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> in
sci.lang:
John Atkinson skreiv:
[...]
As I said before, it's generally believed that the personal affixes
on verbs are grammaticalised pronouns, and that there is a cycle,
free pronoun > clitic > affix > loss of affix due to phonetic erosion
+ obligatory use of free pronouns again.
[...]
Some blurring of the cycle model: In Old Scandinavian,
albeit there was still some conjugation for person and
number around, it was customary to merger the personal
pronoun with the verb in writing: <ert þú> > <erþu>
("are+you") is the most prominsnt example, IIRC.
In my experience usually <ertu>. Other examples: <heyrðu>
from <heyr þú> 'listen!', <seldu> from <sel þú> 'hand
over!', <fórtu> from <fórt þú> 'you went'.
[...]
Brian
.
- References:
- why the -s in English verbs?
- From: ekkilu
- Re: why the -s in English verbs?
- From: Helmut Richter
- Re: why the -s in English verbs?
- From: John Atkinson
- Re: why the -s in English verbs?
- From: Trond Engen
- why the -s in English verbs?
- Prev by Date: Re: new book on the spread of IE
- Next by Date: Re: a few questions about Messapic language
- Previous by thread: Re: why the -s in English verbs?
- Next by thread: Metochia
- Index(es):