Re: Cybalist "laryngeal" lunacy

Dušan Vukotić wrote:
On Mar 27, 10:52 am, Harlan Messinger
<hmessinger.removet...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Dušan Vukotić wrote:
On Mar 26, 11:24 pm, Harlan Messinger
<hmessinger.removet...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Right, never mind that there is overwhelming documentation of these
correspondences.
Of course, there are some examples where kW is changed to w/v/f (Ger.
Quele => Eng. well; OE hweol => Eng. wheel; OE hælþ => Eng. => whole;
Eng. health; well-being; cf. Serb. is-celjen = healed) but it can be
completely examined and sufficiently explained (semantically as well
as phonetically); but in this specific case such a phonetic
development is absolutely out of question.
Except to people who know what they're talking about.

It means that the first above-mentioned group of IE words (oculus) is
derived from the Gon-Bel basis
...which is the very product of an overheated and exuberant imagination.
There is nothing I say here that I cannot prove beyond any doubt.
You mean, besides that fact that everybody in the world but you doubts
it. (You forget--we here have seen your "proofs" and we know that they
leave enough room for doubt and several elephants as well.)

It is not the truth! Can you point out at least one of the messages
where my Xur-Bel-Gon speech formula has been falsified in any segment?
Nothing but simple (ad hominem) "constatations" that my theory is
"crank", without a single argument being revealed for a necessary
substantiation of such a "self-evident truth".

I should draw your attention to the fact that *you* never feel bound to disprove any of the well-established linguistic patterns at which you scoff. It's funny how you think that no one can doubt anything you made up without rigorous proof, while you doubt anything you want based on nothing more than your whim, and you substitute scoffing and insults for proof.
.