Re: Cybalist "laryngeal" lunacy
- From: Dušan Vukotić <dusan.vukotic@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 27 Mar 2008 09:20:11 -0700 (PDT)
On Mar 27, 4:34 pm, Harlan Messinger
<hmessinger.removet...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
It is not the truth! Can you point out at least one of the messages
where my Xur-Bel-Gon speech formula has been falsified in any segment?
The fact that nobody has bothered to disprove something you made up
doesn't mean it's true.
I *have* seen many "proofs" presented by you that have been nonsense,
and you've been told why and how many times.
Please, be more consistent... If no one (as you say) bothered to
disprove "something I made up", how, for god sake, did it happened
that I "have been told why and how many times"?
If you have acquired the basic knowledge in linguistics, then you will
be able to explain why and how the words "ophtalmos" and "opticus" are
(allegedly) derived from the *okW- root? Please, would you mind
showing me just one of those "evidences" from your, above-mentioned,
"overwelming documentation"?
DV
.
- References:
- Cybalist "laryngeal" lunacy
- From: Dušan Vukotić
- Re: Cybalist "laryngeal" lunacy
- From: Harlan Messinger
- Re: Cybalist "laryngeal" lunacy
- From: Dušan Vukotić
- Re: Cybalist "laryngeal" lunacy
- From: Harlan Messinger
- Re: Cybalist "laryngeal" lunacy
- From: Dušan Vukotić
- Re: Cybalist "laryngeal" lunacy
- From: Harlan Messinger
- Cybalist "laryngeal" lunacy
- Prev by Date: Re: Cybalist "laryngeal" lunacy
- Next by Date: Re: Cybalist "laryngeal" lunacy
- Previous by thread: Re: Cybalist "laryngeal" lunacy
- Next by thread: Re: Cybalist "laryngeal" lunacy
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading