Re: The "u" and "v" in older written English is confvsing
- From: "Brian M. Scott" <b.scott@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 16 May 2008 22:29:18 -0400
On Sat, 17 May 2008 03:00:08 +0100, Richard Wordingham
<jrw0602@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in
<news:U_qXj.15453$U61.4618@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> in sci.lang:
[...]
A great many English speakers do not know how to pronounce
"won" - they pronounce it with a short 'o'. (I was
going to write '/wA.n/ or equivalent', but that is
probably less clear a statement.)
Where? I don't think that I've ever heard a native speaker
do this.
[...]
Brian
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: The "u" and "v" in older written English is confvsing
- From: Richard Wordingham
- Re: The "u" and "v" in older written English is confvsing
- From: LEE Sau Dan
- Re: The "u" and "v" in older written English is confvsing
- References:
- The "u" and "v" in older written English is confvsing
- From: 2.7182818284590...
- Re: The "u" and "v" in older written English is confvsing
- From: LEE Sau Dan
- Re: The "u" and "v" in older written English is confvsing
- From: Richard Wordingham
- The "u" and "v" in older written English is confvsing
- Prev by Date: Re: ``4 for $5 each''
- Next by Date: Re: The "u" and "v" in older written English is confvsing
- Previous by thread: Re: The "u" and "v" in older written English is confvsing
- Next by thread: Re: The "u" and "v" in older written English is confvsing
- Index(es):