Re: The "u" and "v" in older written English is confvsing
- From: "Richard Wordingham" <jrw0602@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 19 May 2008 00:05:23 +0100
"Brian M. Scott" <b.scott@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message news:ej4x64pn23o4$.ba5k2ygb2p4j$.dlg@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
On Sat, 17 May 2008 03:00:08 +0100, Richard Wordingham
<jrw0602@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in
<news:U_qXj.15453$U61.4618@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> in sci.lang:
A great many English speakers do not know how to pronounce
"won" - they pronounce it with a short 'o'. (I was
going to write '/wA.n/ or equivalent', but that is
probably less clear a statement.)
Where? I don't think that I've ever heard a native speaker
do this.
Certainly in England. I don't know whether the distribution parallels the pronunciation of _one_ as /wA.n/ - that pronunciation is supposed to be commoner in Northern England.
Richard.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: The "u" and "v" in older written English is confvsing
- From: John Atkinson
- Re: The "u" and "v" in older written English is confvsing
- From: Ruud Harmsen
- Re: The "u" and "v" in older written English is confvsing
- From: Peter T. Daniels
- Re: The "u" and "v" in older written English is confvsing
- References:
- The "u" and "v" in older written English is confvsing
- From: 2.7182818284590...
- Re: The "u" and "v" in older written English is confvsing
- From: LEE Sau Dan
- Re: The "u" and "v" in older written English is confvsing
- From: Richard Wordingham
- Re: The "u" and "v" in older written English is confvsing
- From: Brian M. Scott
- The "u" and "v" in older written English is confvsing
- Prev by Date: Re: Who was the first who did PIE reconstructions?
- Next by Date: Re: The "u" and "v" in older written English is confvsing
- Previous by thread: Re: The "u" and "v" in older written English is confvsing
- Next by thread: Re: The "u" and "v" in older written English is confvsing
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|