Re: The "u" and "v" in older written English is confvsing
- From: "Richard Wordingham" <jrw0602@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 22 May 2008 22:57:12 +0100
"John Atkinson" <johnacko@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message news:_ygZj.3562$IK1.3454@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
"Richard Wordingham" <jrw0602@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote..."Brian M. Scott" <b.scott@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote...Richard Wordingham <jrw0602@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
A great many English speakers do not know how to pronounce
"won" - they pronounce it with a short 'o'. (I was
going to write '/wA.n/ or equivalent', but that is
probably less clear a statement.)
Where? I don't think that I've ever heard a native speaker
do this.
Certainly in England. I don't know whether the distribution parallels the pronunciation of _one_ as /wA.n/ - that pronunciation is supposed to be commoner in Northern England.
Surely in northern England they're both /wUn/ (since the STRUT/FOOT split didn't take place there).
I presume this is a reference to Wells's labels, but they're horrible examples, deriving from Old English _stru:t_ and _fo:t_ respectively. SUN / PUSH might be a better description. Although Modern English has developed a three-way split BLOOD / GOOD / MOOD, Standard /U/ has many sources. For example, the shortening of <-ook> to /Uk/ from /u:k/ has not happened in areas further south than the non-splitting of the short reflexes of Old English *u, and I spent much of my childhood in a village where <glove> was /glu:v/ (the regular development of the oblique forms of Old English _glo:f_). This village lacked the SUN / PUSH split.
Except for people who are trying to acquire a near-RP accent, of course, who I suppose may well approximate RP /V/ using [A.], since they don't have [V] in their local dialect. Are these the people you're thinking of?
Unlikely, since any non-standard [A.] for [V"] occurred in words spelt with <o>.
John.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: The "u" and "v" in older written English is confvsing
- From: John Atkinson
- Re: The "u" and "v" in older written English is confvsing
- References:
- The "u" and "v" in older written English is confvsing
- From: 2.7182818284590...
- Re: The "u" and "v" in older written English is confvsing
- From: LEE Sau Dan
- Re: The "u" and "v" in older written English is confvsing
- From: Richard Wordingham
- Re: The "u" and "v" in older written English is confvsing
- From: Brian M. Scott
- Re: The "u" and "v" in older written English is confvsing
- From: Richard Wordingham
- Re: The "u" and "v" in older written English is confvsing
- From: John Atkinson
- The "u" and "v" in older written English is confvsing
- Prev by Date: Re: Are these languages left to right or right to left ? and windows.
- Next by Date: Re: Sanskrit spṛś sparśa (touch) and Latin a-spergo (sprinkling, spray)
- Previous by thread: Re: The "u" and "v" in older written English is confvsing
- Next by thread: Re: The "u" and "v" in older written English is confvsing
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|