Re: Baghdad

On May 26, 5:01 am, Harlan Messinger
<hmessinger.removet...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

No. Stop making things up.

Göbekli Tepe in southeast Anatolia, just north of the Syrian
Harran plain, 11 600 - 9 500 BC, is for real. You can't
deduce a right of a-priori statements from denying Göbekli
Tepe. According to Klaus Schmidt, excavator of the
most amazing site, Göbekli Tepe was the sacred mountain
of the Mesopotamic deities, and there are features of
the later Iranian civilization. When the Magdalenian
ended, many tribes went eastward, following the animals,
and it may well be that an influential tribe reached
Anatolia and founded Göbekli Tepe, center of a wide
area, and their language would later have spread in
all directions, also influencing Semitic and Hamitic.
Recently I read in a book about the Jemen that
Semitic an-aku and Latin ego are akin. I derive ego
from Magdalenian OC CO for eye (oc) reasoning (co),
the internal "Instanz" (German, I don't know the proper
English word, perhaps authority?) that coordinates
the sensual impressions, -aku is even closer to
hypothetical OC CO than ego. There _are_ IE
influences in the Semitic and Hamitic languages,
and Göbekli Tepe, in my opinion, could well have
been the center of both cultural and linguistic
development in the Ancient Near East. Including
Irania, of course. And the killrating mob of sci.lang
can't change it. Göbekli Tepe won't go away. No
mean spirit of a scientific group can make it
disappear.
.