Re: Why is walk spelt that way ?
- From: mb <azythos2@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 9 Jun 2008 14:02:33 -0700 (PDT)
On Jun 9, 11:20 am, "ranjit_math...@xxxxxxxxx"
...
wouldn't solve the problem of how to pronounce an /a/ that's not
silent since /a/ has realizations of [E],[V],[@] and [i"].
But not of [a] (non-English [a])? If that is true, why call it a
phoneme /a/, of all things?
Or of zero?
By the way, is this really one Hindi phoneme /a/, or just the
different sounds of the grapheme equivalent to <a>, and that one
equivalent to different phonemes, or part of?
Also, did the idea of representing all these sounds with <a> in
Western transcription originate with Sanskrit?
Asking for details because I have not the foggiest idea.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Why is walk spelt that way ?
- From: Ruud Harmsen
- Re: Why is walk spelt that way ?
- From: ranjit_mathews@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: Why is walk spelt that way ?
- From: Joachim Pense
- Re: Why is walk spelt that way ?
- References:
- Re: Why is walk spelt that way ?
- From: ranjit_mathews@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: Why is walk spelt that way ?
- Prev by Date: Re: Why is walk spelt that way ?
- Next by Date: Re: Why is walk spelt that way ?
- Previous by thread: Re: Why is walk spelt that way ?
- Next by thread: Re: Why is walk spelt that way ?
- Index(es):