Re: BBC does it again
- From: Ruud Harmsen <realemailonsite@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2008 10:23:26 +0200
Mon, 9 Jun 2008 10:49:39 -0700 (PDT): "Peter T. Daniels"
<grammatim@xxxxxxxxxxx>: in sci.lang:
Because /a/ is the latter vowel in BrE. The father vowel is /A:/
Once again, you are making a _single_ phonemic contrast with two
_different_ symbols -- lettershape AND length-mark. One (and only one)
of them is redundant. Either you distinguish the vowels by quality, OR
you distinguish them by quantity. NOT by both.
I know this counters the generally held view, but I don't agree with
that view.
--
Ruud Harmsen
http://rudhar.com
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: BBC does it again
- From: Peter T. Daniels
- Re: BBC does it again
- References:
- Re: BBC does it again
- From: Harlan Messinger
- Re: BBC does it again
- From: Peter T. Daniels
- Re: BBC does it again
- From: Harlan Messinger
- Re: BBC does it again
- From: Peter T. Daniels
- Re: BBC does it again
- From: Andrew Woode
- Re: BBC does it again
- From: Peter T. Daniels
- Re: BBC does it again
- From: Ruud Harmsen
- Re: BBC does it again
- From: Peter T. Daniels
- Re: BBC does it again
- Prev by Date: Re: BBC does it again
- Next by Date: Re: Why is walk spelt that way ?
- Previous by thread: Re: BBC does it again
- Next by thread: Re: BBC does it again
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading