Re: BBC does it again
- From: "Peter T. Daniels" <grammatim@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2008 12:13:12 -0700 (PDT)
On Jun 10, 12:24 pm, "Brian M. Scott" <b.sc...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Tue, 10 Jun 2008 05:22:14 -0700 (PDT), "Peter T. Daniels"
<gramma...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in
<news:87f3fee1-d9fd-48c0-bce1-2481ece234b3@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
in sci.lang:
On Jun 10, 4:23 am, Ruud Harmsen <realemailons...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
Mon, 9 Jun 2008 10:49:39 -0700 (PDT): "Peter T. Daniels"Then don't expect to be understood, or taken seriously.
<gramma...@xxxxxxxxxxx>: in sci.lang:
I know this counters the generally held view, but I don't agree withBecause /a/ is the latter vowel in BrE. The father vowel is /A:/Once again, you are making a _single_ phonemic contrast with two
_different_ symbols -- lettershape AND length-mark. One (and only one)
of them is redundant. Either you distinguish the vowels by quality, OR
you distinguish them by quantity. NOT by both.
that view.
By you. Others seem to have no trouble, and as I pointed
out a while back, the Handbook of the IPA explicitly says
that this sort of representation is 'in accord with the
principles of the IPA'.
The IPA has always considered itself something apart from phonemic
theory. A "broad transcription" is not necessarily the same as a
phonemic transcription, and / / are not part of the IPA system.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: BBC does it again
- From: Brian M. Scott
- Re: BBC does it again
- References:
- Re: BBC does it again
- From: Harlan Messinger
- Re: BBC does it again
- From: Peter T. Daniels
- Re: BBC does it again
- From: Harlan Messinger
- Re: BBC does it again
- From: Peter T. Daniels
- Re: BBC does it again
- From: Andrew Woode
- Re: BBC does it again
- From: Peter T. Daniels
- Re: BBC does it again
- From: Ruud Harmsen
- Re: BBC does it again
- From: Peter T. Daniels
- Re: BBC does it again
- From: Ruud Harmsen
- Re: BBC does it again
- From: Peter T. Daniels
- Re: BBC does it again
- From: Brian M. Scott
- Re: BBC does it again
- Prev by Date: Re: The case of the Hebrew word for "oxygen"...
- Next by Date: Re: BBC does it again
- Previous by thread: Re: BBC does it again
- Next by thread: Re: BBC does it again
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading