Re: BBC does it again
- From: Harlan Messinger <hmessinger.removethis@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 11 Jun 2008 07:38:48 -0400
Brian M. Scott wrote:
On Tue, 10 Jun 2008 18:11:53 -0400, Harlan Messinger
<hmessinger.removethis@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in
<news:6b8ch7F3aur64U1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> in sci.lang:
Brian M. Scott wrote:
On Tue, 10 Jun 2008 15:53:09 -0400, Harlan Messinger
<hmessinger.removethis@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in
<news:6b84d6F3a58pkU1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> in sci.lang:
[...]
It does seem (to me) reasonable to suggest that whatever
phonemic representation one chooses to use ought to
express the same thing as the phonemic model the same
person uses to describe a language. [...]
I don't agree,
Why? Why *would* one use a representation that doesn't
correspond to the model? [...]
John's given one reason. Another is to avoid throwing away
information that may be useful, either to someone else or to
me on another occasion. I'm not much interested in abstract
phonology; I *am* interested in useful description.
Well--the phonetic representation conveys *that*! I'm talking about the phonemic representation, so by definition we're talking about the abstract phonology.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: BBC does it again
- From: John Atkinson
- Re: BBC does it again
- References:
- Re: BBC does it again
- From: Harlan Messinger
- Re: BBC does it again
- From: Peter T. Daniels
- Re: BBC does it again
- From: Harlan Messinger
- Re: BBC does it again
- From: Peter T. Daniels
- Re: BBC does it again
- From: Andrew Woode
- Re: BBC does it again
- From: Peter T. Daniels
- Re: BBC does it again
- From: Ruud Harmsen
- Re: BBC does it again
- From: Peter T. Daniels
- Re: BBC does it again
- From: Ruud Harmsen
- Re: BBC does it again
- From: Peter T. Daniels
- Re: BBC does it again
- From: Brian M. Scott
- Re: BBC does it again
- From: Peter T. Daniels
- Re: BBC does it again
- From: Brian M. Scott
- Re: BBC does it again
- From: Harlan Messinger
- Re: BBC does it again
- From: Brian M. Scott
- Re: BBC does it again
- From: Harlan Messinger
- Re: BBC does it again
- From: Brian M. Scott
- Re: BBC does it again
- Prev by Date: Re: Why is walk spelt that way ?
- Next by Date: Re: 1950s American English intonation?
- Previous by thread: Re: BBC does it again
- Next by thread: Re: BBC does it again
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading