Re: The monumental stupidity of PIE theorists further illustrated
- From: Dušan Vukotić <dusan.vukotic@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 28 Jun 2008 14:45:58 -0700 (PDT)
On Jun 28, 4:52 pm, analys...@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
Sanskrit snuṣā is derived from the word "sun" in the same way as it
happened to sūnu (son; Ger. Sonne => Sohn; Serb. sunce => sinak, sin;
English sun =>
But of course !
What is more natural than "son's wife" or "son's woman" for daughter-
in-law?
You have helped illustrate the lack of common sense of PIEists even
better. "Daughter-in-law" is a derived relationship and whats more
natural than for it to be derived from the word for "son" ?
son);http://groups.google.com/group/soc.culture.indian/msg/
d47a7ddea6d6803...
But, there is a small problem.
Hindi sukhanā (to dry; Serb. suknuti sudden gush of flame; sušiti to
dry; Skt.śuṣyati dry up) is related to the sun, as well as similar
words in Sanskrit.
Everything looks OK, but, nevertheless, there is no name for the sun
itself in Sanskrit (or I cannot find it) from which the word sūnu
(son) is derived. Unusual, isn't it?
DV
.
- References:
- Re: The monumental stupidity of PIE theorists further illustrated
- From: Dušan Vukotić
- Re: The monumental stupidity of PIE theorists further illustrated
- From: analyst41
- Re: The monumental stupidity of PIE theorists further illustrated
- Prev by Date: Re: The monumental stupidity of PIE theorists further illustrated
- Next by Date: Re: Ligurian ending "-asco"
- Previous by thread: Re: The monumental stupidity of PIE theorists further illustrated
- Next by thread: Beetel Pearl clip Telephone
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|