sci.lang

• Date Index

---

• Rules to add -ing,-ed,-s endings to English verbs, Visa Inquirer
  • Re: Rules to add -ing,-ed,-s endings to English verbs, Peter T. Daniels
    • Re: Rules to add -ing,-ed,-s endings to English verbs, Visa Inquirer
• The Cybalist guru's ignorance, Dušan Vukotić
  • Re: The Cybalist guru's ignorance, Peter T. Daniels
    • Re: The Cybalist guru's ignorance, Dušan Vukotić
      • Re: The Cybalist guru's ignorance, Peter T. Daniels
      • Re: The Cybalist guru's ignorance, Bart Mathias
      • Re: The Cybalist guru's ignorance, Paul J Kriha
      • Re: The Cybalist guru's ignorance, Craoibhin66
  • Re: The Cybalist guru's ignorance, Harlan Messinger
    • Re: The Cybalist guru's ignorance, Dušan Vukotić
      • Re: The Cybalist guru's ignorance, Harlan Messinger
• when were Greek and Latin speakers first aware of their language, analyst41
  • Re: when were Greek and Latin speakers first aware of their language, Harlan Messinger
    • Re: when were Greek and Latin speakers first aware of their language, analyst41
      • Re: when were Greek and Latin speakers first aware of their language, Harlan Messinger
• 73 Free Learn Spanish Study Sheets, jrichman
• Home shop 18 - Nokia GSM Mobile Phone Model No: 7500 Prism, Ayushi Mehra
• Beetel Pearl clip Telephone, Ayushi Mehra
• The monumental stupidity of PIE theorists further illustrated, analyst41
  • Re: The monumental stupidity of PIE theorists further illustrated, analyst41
  • Re: The monumental stupidity of PIE theorists further illustrated, Dušan Vukotić
  • Re: The monumental stupidity of PIE theorists further illustrated, Peter T. Daniels
  • Re: The monumental stupidity of PIE theorists further illustrated, Harlan Messinger
  • Re: The monumental stupidity of PIE theorists further illustrated, Harlan Messinger
    • Re: The monumental stupidity of PIE theorists further illustrated, analyst41
      • Re: The monumental stupidity of PIE theorists further illustrated, Harlan Messinger
      • Re: The monumental stupidity of PIE theorists further illustrated, Peter T. Daniels
      • Re: The monumental stupidity of PIE theorists further illustrated, analyst41
      • Re: The monumental stupidity of PIE theorists further illustrated, analyst41
      • Re: The monumental stupidity of PIE theorists further illustrated, Nathan Sanders
      • Re: The monumental stupidity of PIE theorists further illustrated, Craoibhin66
      • Re: The monumental stupidity of PIE theorists further illustrated, Nathan Sanders
      • Re: The monumental stupidity of PIE theorists further illustrated, analyst41
      • Re: The monumental stupidity of PIE theorists further illustrated, Nathan Sanders
      • Re: The monumental stupidity of PIE theorists further illustrated, Peter T. Daniels
      • Re: The monumental stupidity of PIE theorists further illustrated, Nathan Sanders
      • Re: The monumental stupidity of PIE theorists further illustrated, Peter T. Daniels
      • Re: The monumental stupidity of PIE theorists further illustrated, Nathan Sanders
      • Re: The monumental stupidity of PIE theorists further illustrated, Bart Mathias
      • Re: The monumental stupidity of PIE theorists further illustrated, analyst41
      • Re: The monumental stupidity of PIE theorists further illustrated, Craoibhin66
      • Re: The monumental stupidity of PIE theorists further illustrated, Harlan Messinger
      • Re: The monumental stupidity of PIE theorists further illustrated, analyst41
      • Re: The monumental stupidity of PIE theorists further illustrated, Harlan Messinger
      • Re: The monumental stupidity of PIE theorists further illustrated, analyst41
      • Re: The monumental stupidity of PIE theorists further illustrated, Harlan Messinger
      • Re: The monumental stupidity of PIE theorists further illustrated, Craoibhin66
      • Re: The monumental stupidity of PIE theorists further illustrated, Peter T. Daniels
      • Re: The monumental stupidity of PIE theorists further illustrated, Nathan Sanders
      • Re: The monumental stupidity of PIE theorists further illustrated, analyst41
      • Re: The monumental stupidity of PIE theorists further illustrated, Nathan Sanders
      • Re: The monumental stupidity of PIE theorists further illustrated, analyst41
      • Re: The monumental stupidity of PIE theorists further illustrated, Nathan Sanders
      • Re: The monumental stupidity of PIE theorists further illustrated, analyst41
      • Re: The monumental stupidity of PIE theorists further illustrated, Peter T. Daniels
      • Ordering of letters in alphabet, Herman Rubin
      • Re: Ordering of letters in alphabet, Peter T. Daniels
      • Re: The monumental stupidity of PIE theorists further illustrated, Jack Campin - bogus address
      • Re: The monumental stupidity of PIE theorists further illustrated, Nathan Sanders
      • Re: The monumental stupidity of PIE theorists further illustrated, John Atkinson
      • Re: The monumental stupidity of PIE theorists further illustrated, Peter T. Daniels
      • Re: The monumental stupidity of PIE theorists further illustrated, John Atkinson
      • Re: The monumental stupidity of PIE theorists further illustrated, Andrew Woode
      • Re: The monumental stupidity of PIE theorists further illustrated, John Atkinson
      • Re: The monumental stupidity of PIE theorists further illustrated, Nathan Sanders
      • Re: The monumental stupidity of PIE theorists further illustrated, John Atkinson
      • Re: The monumental stupidity of PIE theorists further illustrated, Nathan Sanders
      • Re: The monumental stupidity of PIE theorists further illustrated, John Atkinson
      • Re: The monumental stupidity of PIE theorists further illustrated, Nathan Sanders
      • Randomness and linguistic development, Herman Rubin
      • Re: Randomness and linguistic development, Nathan Sanders
      • Re: Randomness and linguistic development, Nathan Sanders
      • Re: The monumental stupidity of PIE theorists further illustrated, Harlan Messinger
      • Re: The monumental stupidity of PIE theorists further illustrated, John Atkinson
      • Re: The monumental stupidity of PIE theorists further illustrated, Harlan Messinger
      • Re: The monumental stupidity of PIE theorists further illustrated, Brian M. Scott
      • Re: The monumental stupidity of PIE theorists further illustrated, John Atkinson
      • Re: The monumental stupidity of PIE theorists further illustrated, Brian M. Scott
      • Re: The monumental stupidity of PIE theorists further illustrated, Harlan Messinger
      • Re: The monumental stupidity of PIE theorists further illustrated, Brian M. Scott
      • Re: The monumental stupidity of PIE theorists further illustrated, Harlan Messinger
      • Re: The monumental stupidity of PIE theorists further illustrated, Brian M. Scott
      • Re: The monumental stupidity of PIE theorists further illustrated, Harlan Messinger
      • Re: The monumental stupidity of PIE theorists further illustrated, Brian M. Scott
      • Re: The monumental stupidity of PIE theorists further illustrated, John Atkinson
      • Re: The monumental stupidity of PIE theorists further illustrated, Brian M. Scott
      • Re: The monumental stupidity of PIE theorists further illustrated, Peter T. Daniels
      • Re: The monumental stupidity of PIE theorists further illustrated, Peter T. Daniels
      • Re: The monumental stupidity of PIE theorists further illustrated, Nathan Sanders
      • Re: The monumental stupidity of PIE theorists further illustrated, Harlan Messinger
      • Re: The monumental stupidity of PIE theorists further illustrated, Nathan Sanders
      • Re: The monumental stupidity of PIE theorists further illustrated, Peter T. Daniels
      • Re: The monumental stupidity of PIE theorists further illustrated, Harlan Messinger
      • Re: The monumental stupidity of PIE theorists further illustrated, Nathan Sanders
      • Re: The monumental stupidity of PIE theorists further illustrated, Ruud Harmsen
  • Re: The monumental stupidity of PIE theorists further illustrated, analyst41
    • Re: The monumental stupidity of PIE theorists further illustrated, analyst41
      • Re: The monumental stupidity of PIE theorists further illustrated, Peter T. Daniels
      • Re: The monumental stupidity of PIE theorists further illustrated, analyst41
    • Re: The monumental stupidity of PIE theorists further illustrated, Harlan Messinger
      • Re: The monumental stupidity of PIE theorists further illustrated, analyst41
      • Re: The monumental stupidity of PIE theorists further illustrated, Peter T. Daniels
      • Re: The monumental stupidity of PIE theorists further illustrated, Harlan Messinger
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: The monumental stupidity of PIE theorists further illustrated, Dušan Vukotić
    • Re: The monumental stupidity of PIE theorists further illustrated, analyst41
      • Re: The monumental stupidity of PIE theorists further illustrated, Dušan Vukotić
• Speakers of tonal languages more logical?, Sonja Elen Kisa
  • Re: Speakers of tonal languages more logical?, Neil Coffey
  • Re: Speakers of tonal languages more logical?, LEE Sau Dan
• "Impossible n'est pas français" and calquing: An interesting point to consider, Daniel al-Autistiqui
  • Re: "Impossible n'est pas français" and calquing: An interesting point to consider, António Marques
    • Re: "Impossible n'est pas français" and calquing: An interesting point to consider, Iain
  • Re: "Impossible n'est pas français" and calquing: An interesting point to consider, Lanarcam
    • Re: "Impossible n'est pas français" and calquing: An interesting point to consider, Peter T. Daniels
• A bilingual language?, noesy_parker
  • Re: A bilingual language?, Craoibhin66
    • Re: A bilingual language?, noesy_parker
      • Re: A bilingual language?, Craoibhin66
    • Re: A bilingual language?, Ruud Harmsen
  • Re: A bilingual language?, LEE Sau Dan
    • Re: A bilingual language?, noesy_parker
      • Re: A bilingual language?, Padraic Brown
      • Re: A bilingual language?, Craoibhin66
      • Re: A bilingual language?, noesy_parker
      • Re: A bilingual language?, Craoibhin66
      • Re: A bilingual language?, Peter T. Daniels
      • Re: A bilingual language?, Craoibhin66
      • Re: A bilingual language?, Peter T. Daniels
      • Re: A bilingual language?, Craoibhin66
      • Re: A bilingual language?, Padraic Brown
      • Re: A bilingual language?, LEE Sau Dan
      • Re: A bilingual language?, Peter T. Daniels
      • Re: A bilingual language?, LEE Sau Dan
      • Re: A bilingual language?, Ekkehard Dengler
      • Re: A bilingual language?, Craoibhin66
    • Re: A bilingual language?, Iain
    • Re: A bilingual language?, Craoibhin66
    • Re: A bilingual language?, wugi
• More Indo european follies, analyst41
  • Re: More Indo european follies, Brian M. Scott
    • Re: More Indo european follies, analyst41
      • Re: More Indo european follies, Peter T. Daniels
      • Re: More Indo european follies, Harlan Messinger
      • Re: More Indo european follies, analyst41
      • Re: More Indo european follies, Harlan Messinger
      • Re: More Indo european follies, Brian M. Scott
      • Re: More Indo european follies, Harlan Messinger
      • Re: More Indo european follies, ranjit_mathews@xxxxxxxxx
      • Re: More Indo european follies, Peter T. Daniels
      • Re: More Indo european follies, ranjit_mathews@xxxxxxxxx
      • Re: More Indo european follies, Nathan Sanders
      • Re: More Indo european follies, analyst41
      • Re: More Indo european follies, Nathan Sanders
      • Re: More Indo european follies, analyst41
      • Re: More Indo european follies, Nathan Sanders
      • Re: More Indo european follies, Harlan Messinger
      • Re: More Indo european follies, António Marques
      • Re: More Indo european follies, Dušan Vukotić
      • Re: More Indo european follies, Harlan Messinger
      • Re: More Indo european follies, Dušan Vukotić
      • Re: More Indo european follies, Harlan Messinger
      • Re: More Indo european follies, Dušan Vukotić
      • Re: More Indo european follies, Harlan Messinger
      • Re: More Indo european follies, Dušan Vukotić
      • Re: More Indo european follies, Harlan Messinger
      • Re: More Indo european follies, Peter T. Daniels
      • Re: More Indo european follies, Dušan Vukotić
      • Re: More Indo european follies, Paul J Kriha
      • Re: More Indo european follies, Dušan Vukotić
      • Re: More Indo european follies, Paul J Kriha
      • Re: More Indo european follies, Dušan Vukotić
      • Re: More Indo european follies, analyst41
      • Re: More Indo european follies, Harlan Messinger
      • Re: More Indo european follies, analyst41
      • Re: More Indo european follies, Harlan Messinger
      • Re: More Indo european follies, analyst41
      • Re: More Indo european follies, Harlan Messinger
      • Re: More Indo european follies, António Marques
      • Re: More Indo european follies, analyst41
      • Re: More Indo european follies, Harlan Messinger
      • Re: More Indo european follies, Nathan Sanders
      • Re: More Indo european follies, analyst41
      • Re: More Indo european follies, Peter T. Daniels
      • Re: More Indo european follies, Brian M. Scott
      • Re: More Indo european follies, Nathan Sanders
      • Re: More Indo european follies, analyst41
      • Re: More Indo european follies, Ruud Harmsen
      • Re: More Indo european follies, Nathan Sanders
      • Re: More Indo european follies, Ruud Harmsen
      • Re: More Indo european follies, Franz Gnaedinger
      • Re: More Indo european follies, Craoibhin66
    • Re: More Indo european follies, Franz Gnaedinger
      • Re: More Indo european follies, Craoibhin66
      • Re: More Indo european follies, Peter T. Daniels
      • Re: More Indo european follies, Craoibhin66
      • Re: More Indo european follies, Peter T. Daniels
      • Re: More Indo european follies, paul . kriha
    • Re: More Indo european follies, analyst41
      • Re: More Indo european follies, mb
      • Re: More Indo european follies, Trond Engen
      • Re: More Indo european follies, Peter T. Daniels
      • Re: More Indo european follies, Trond Engen
      • Re: More Indo european follies, António Marques
      • Re: More Indo european follies, analyst41
      • Re: More Indo european follies, Harlan Messinger
      • Re: More Indo european follies, Peter T. Daniels
      • Re: More Indo european follies, analyst41
      • Re: More Indo european follies, Harlan Messinger
      • Re: More Indo european follies, Craoibhin66
      • Re: More Indo european follies, Craoibhin66
      • Re: More Indo european follies, Harlan Messinger
      • Re: More Indo european follies, analyst41
      • Re: More Indo european follies, Harlan Messinger
      • Re: More Indo european follies, analyst41
      • Re: More Indo european follies, Harlan Messinger
      • Re: More Indo european follies, Peter T. Daniels
      • Re: More Indo european follies, Toni Keskitalo
      • Re: More Indo european follies, martin . taylor1952
      • Re: More Indo european follies, Brian M. Scott
      • Re: More Indo european follies, analyst41
      • Re: More Indo european follies, Brian M. Scott
      • Re: More Indo european follies, analyst41
      • Re: More Indo european follies, Harlan Messinger
      • Re: More Indo european follies, Craoibhin66
      • Re: More Indo european follies, Franz Gnaedinger
      • Re: More Indo european follies, Craoibhin66
      • Re: More Indo european follies, Harlan Messinger
      • Re: More Indo european follies, analyst41
      • Re: More Indo european follies, Franz Gnaedinger
      • Re: More Indo european follies, Craoibhin66
      • Re: More Indo european follies, Franz Gnaedinger
      • Re: More Indo european follies, Craoibhin66
      • Re: More Indo european follies, analyst41
      • Re: More Indo european follies, analyst41
      • Re: More Indo european follies, Harlan Messinger
      • Re: More Indo european follies, Dušan Vukotić
  • Re: More Indo european follies, Dušan Vukotić
• suspicious, curious, ..., msh210
  • Re: suspicious, curious, ..., Harlan Messinger
    • Re: suspicious, curious, ..., msh210
      • Re: suspicious, curious, ..., Harlan Messinger
    • Re: suspicious, curious, ..., Brian M. Scott
      • Re: suspicious, curious, ..., Harlan Messinger
      • Re: suspicious, curious, ..., Ekkehard Dengler
      • Re: suspicious, curious, ..., msh210
      • Re: suspicious, curious, ..., António Marques
      • Re: suspicious, curious, ..., Brian M. Scott
      • Re: suspicious, curious, ..., Harlan Messinger
• Noah — I knew you knew the newest heavenly novelties, Dušan Vukotić
• has anybody read this book?, analyst41
  • Re: has anybody read this book?, Craoibhin66
  • Re: has anybody read this book?, Harlan Messinger
  • Re: has anybody read this book?, John Atkinson
• Learn spoken English, Arumugham
• Pre-Slavic language of Poland, 2.7182818284590...
  • Re: Pre-Slavic language of Poland, Dušan Vukotić
  • Re: Pre-Slavic language of Poland, Craoibhin66
  • Re: Pre-Slavic language of Poland, ranjit_mathews@xxxxxxxxx
    • Re: Pre-Slavic language of Poland, mbiernat
• The world chess champion explains the origin of chess, analyst41
  • Re: The world chess champion explains the origin of chess, Peter T. Daniels
    • Re: The world chess champion explains the origin of chess, Yusuf B Gursey
      • Re: The world chess champion explains the origin of chess, analyst41
      • Re: The world chess champion explains the origin of chess, Yusuf B Gursey
      • Re: The world chess champion explains the origin of chess, analyst41
      • Re: The world chess champion explains the origin of chess, Yusuf B Gursey
      • Re: The world chess champion explains the origin of chess, Ruud Harmsen
      • Re: The world chess champion explains the origin of chess, Peter T. Daniels
      • Re: The world chess champion explains the origin of chess, Yusuf B Gursey
      • Re: The world chess champion explains the origin of chess, Yusuf B Gursey
      • Re: The world chess champion explains the origin of chess, Yusuf B Gursey
      • Re: The world chess champion explains the origin of chess, Yusuf B Gursey
    • Re: The world chess champion explains the origin of chess, Brian M. Scott
  • Re: The world chess champion explains the origin of chess, Harlan Messinger
    • Re: The world chess champion explains the origin of chess, analyst41
      • Re: The world chess champion explains the origin of chess, Harlan Messinger
      • Re: The world chess champion explains the origin of chess, analyst41
      • Re: The world chess champion explains the origin of chess, Harlan Messinger
      • Re: The world chess champion explains the origin of chess, Peter T. Daniels
      • Re: The world chess champion explains the origin of chess, analyst41
      • Re: The world chess champion explains the origin of chess, Peter T. Daniels
• A wondering winter wandering, Dušan Vukotić
• hai dear, brown
• Iblis from Heavenly Nebula, Dušan Vukotić
  • Re: Iblis from Heavenly Nebula, Yusuf B Gursey
    • Re: Iblis from Heavenly Nebula, Paul J Kriha
    • Re: Iblis from Heavenly Nebula, Dušan Vukotić
      • Re: Iblis from Heavenly Nebula, Dušan Vukotić
      • Re: Iblis from Heavenly Nebula, Dušan Vukotić
      • Re: Iblis from Heavenly Nebula, Yusuf B Gursey
• Celebration => Lyberty; Sloboda => Slava, Dušan Vukotić
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Celebration => Lyberty; Sloboda => Slava, Dušan Vukotić
• Knowing when to use "it's" and "its", James H. Newman
  • Re: Knowing when to use "it's" and "its", Bart Mathias
    • Re: Knowing when to use "it's" and "its", Paul J Kriha
      • Re: Knowing when to use "it's" and "its", Peter T. Daniels
      • Re: Knowing when to use "it's" and "its", analyst41
      • Re: Knowing when to use "it's" and "its", aniod
      • Re: Knowing when to use "it's" and "its", John Atkinson
      • Re: Knowing when to use "it's" and "its", Peter T. Daniels
    • Re: Knowing when to use "it's" and "its", aniod
  • Re: Knowing when to use "it's" and "its", Iain
    • Re: Knowing when to use "it's" and "its", aniod
      • Re: Knowing when to use "it's" and "its", Peter T. Daniels
      • Re: Knowing when to use "it's" and "its", Iain
      • Re: Knowing when to use "it's" and "its", Ruud Harmsen
      • Re: Knowing when to use "it's" and "its", Peter T. Daniels
      • Re: Knowing when to use "it's" and "its", Iain
      • Re: Knowing when to use "it's" and "its", Peter T. Daniels
• To strafe at, Ron Hardin
• The origin/meaning of a name, willow
• Why this group connects language and race so often, mbiernat
  • Re: Why this group connects language and race so often, Ruud Harmsen
  • Re: Why this group connects language and race so often, Peter T. Daniels
  • Re: Why this group connects language and race so often, Harlan Messinger
  • Re: Why this group connects language and race so often, António Marques
• Cross-post: New Episode on the Celtic Myth Podshow - The Harp's Voice Unleashed, Silverwolf
• The legend about Kino, hagen
• Canterbury tales, aniod
  • Re: Canterbury tales, Craoibhin66
    • Re: Canterbury tales, aniod
      • Re: Canterbury tales, Joachim Pense
      • Re: Canterbury tales, aniod
    • Re: Canterbury tales, Harlan Messinger
• Ligurian ending "-asco", Marco Pagliero
  • Re: Ligurian ending "-asco", António Marques
    • Re: Ligurian ending "-asco", Marco Pagliero
  • Re: Ligurian ending "-asco", Franz Gnaedinger
    • Re: Ligurian ending "-asco", Harlan Messinger
    • Re: Ligurian ending "-asco", Franz Gnaedinger
      • Re: Ligurian ending "-asco", mb
      • Re: Ligurian ending "-asco", Franz Gnaedinger
      • Re: Ligurian ending "-asco", Craoibhin66
      • Re: Ligurian ending "-asco", Craoibhin66
      • Re: Ligurian ending "-asco", Marco Pagliero
      • Re: Ligurian ending "-asco", Franz Gnaedinger
    • Re: Ligurian ending "-asco", Craoibhin66
  • Re: Ligurian ending "-asco", mb
    • Re: Ligurian ending "-asco", Marco Pagliero
      • Re: Ligurian ending "-asco", Franz Gnaedinger
      • Re: Ligurian ending "-asco", mb
      • Re: Ligurian ending "-asco", Franz Gnaedinger
      • Re: Ligurian ending "-asco", mb
      • Re: Ligurian ending "-asco", mb
  • Re: Ligurian ending "-asco", Douglas G. Kilday
    • Re: Ligurian ending "-asco", Franz Gnaedinger
      • Re: Ligurian ending "-asco", Douglas G. Kilday
      • Re: Ligurian ending "-asco", Brian M. Scott
      • Re: Ligurian ending "-asco", Douglas G. Kilday
      • Re: Ligurian ending "-asco", Brian M. Scott
      • Re: Ligurian ending "-asco", Franz Gnaedinger
      • Re: Ligurian ending "-asco", Peter T. Daniels
      • Re: Ligurian ending "-asco", Franz Gnaedinger
      • Re: Ligurian ending "-asco", mb
      • Re: Ligurian ending "-asco", Douglas G. Kilday
      • Re: Ligurian ending "-asco", mb
      • Re: Ligurian ending "-asco", Italo
      • Re: Ligurian ending "-asco", Dušan Vukotić
      • Re: Ligurian ending "-asco", Italo
      • Re: Ligurian ending "-asco", Dušan Vukotić
      • Re: Ligurian ending "-asco", mb
      • Re: Ligurian ending "-asco", Dušan Vukotić
      • Re: Ligurian ending "-asco", Franz Gnaedinger
      • Re: Ligurian ending "-asco", mb
      • Re: Ligurian ending "-asco", Franz Gnaedinger
      • Re: Ligurian ending "-asco", mb
    • Re: Ligurian ending "-asco", Marco Pagliero
• Re: On the matter of authority vs evidence, Martin Edwards
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: On the matter of authority vs evidence, Peter T. Daniels
• American English Intonation - New Thread, PT
  • Re: American English Intonation - New Thread, aniod
• New words every time u visit Google.com, Viral
• Re: *UFO s Chasing Plane in Aylesbury, UK 14 June 2008, Millitary jets involved ! ! !, adam
• ghgut jhdf, karthik
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • ghgut jhdf, karthik
• Re: THE ARYAN INVASION MYTH, analyst41
  • Re: THE ARYAN INVASION MYTH, Peter T. Daniels
    • Re: THE ARYAN INVASION MYTH, analyst41
      • Re: THE ARYAN INVASION MYTH, benlizro@xxxxxxxxxx
      • Re: THE ARYAN INVASION MYTH, analyst41
      • Re: THE ARYAN INVASION MYTH, Peter T. Daniels
      • Re: THE ARYAN INVASION MYTH, benlizro@xxxxxxxxxx
      • Re: THE ARYAN INVASION MYTH, analyst41
      • Re: THE ARYAN INVASION MYTH, Peter T. Daniels
      • Re: THE ARYAN INVASION MYTH, benlizro@xxxxxxxxxx
      • Re: THE ARYAN INVASION MYTH, analyst41
      • Re: THE ARYAN INVASION MYTH, benlizro@xxxxxxxxxx
      • Re: THE ARYAN INVASION MYTH, analyst41
      • Re: THE ARYAN INVASION MYTH, mb
      • Re: THE ARYAN INVASION MYTH, Harlan Messinger
      • Re: THE ARYAN INVASION MYTH, analyst41
      • Re: THE ARYAN INVASION MYTH, Harlan Messinger
      • Re: THE ARYAN INVASION MYTH, Joachim Pense
      • Re: THE ARYAN INVASION MYTH, analyst41
      • Re: THE ARYAN INVASION MYTH, Peter T. Daniels
      • Re: THE ARYAN INVASION MYTH, benlizro@xxxxxxxxxx
      • Re: THE ARYAN INVASION MYTH, Peter T. Daniels
      • Re: THE ARYAN INVASION MYTH, benlizro@xxxxxxxxxx
      • Re: THE ARYAN INVASION MYTH, analyst41
      • Re: THE ARYAN INVASION MYTH, mb
      • Re: THE ARYAN INVASION MYTH, Peter T. Daniels
      • Re: THE ARYAN INVASION MYTH, Joachim Pense
      • Re: THE ARYAN INVASION MYTH, analyst41
      • Re: THE ARYAN INVASION MYTH, benlizro@xxxxxxxxxx
      • Re: THE ARYAN INVASION MYTH, Joachim Pense
      • Re: THE ARYAN INVASION MYTH, benlizro@xxxxxxxxxx
      • Re: THE ARYAN INVASION MYTH, Paul J Kriha
      • Re: THE ARYAN INVASION MYTH, Harlan Messinger
      • Re: THE ARYAN INVASION MYTH, analyst41
      • Re: THE ARYAN INVASION MYTH, Harlan Messinger
      • Re: THE ARYAN INVASION MYTH, analyst41
      • Re: THE ARYAN INVASION MYTH, Harlan Messinger
      • Re: THE ARYAN INVASION MYTH, ranjit_mathews@xxxxxxxxx
      • Re: THE ARYAN INVASION MYTH, Peter T. Daniels
• Slipping into sleep (not oblivion!) on a slobbish (Slavish) slope, Dušan Vukotić
  • Re: Slipping into sleep (not oblivion!) on a slobbish (Slavish) slope, Dušan Vukotić
    • Re: Slipping into sleep (not oblivion!) on a slobbish (Slavish) slope, Dušan Vukotić
      • Re: Slipping into sleep (not oblivion!) on a slobbish (Slavish) slope, Dušan Vukotić
      • Re: Slipping into sleep (not oblivion!) on a slobbish (Slavish) slope, Heidi Graw
      • Re: Slipping into sleep (not oblivion!) on a slobbish (Slavish) slope, Dušan Vukotić
• Serb. Sličuge (Ice Skates) = Eng. Sledge/Sled/Sleigh, Dušan Vukotić
  • Re: Serb. Sličuge (Ice Skates) = Eng. Sledge/Sled/Sleigh, Dušan Vukotić
• The 4 Essential Tips For Learning Japanese, fabio
• Learn Spanish Audio - 4 Tips To Drastically Improve Your Learning, fabio
• Is "linear writing system" an established term?, Joachim Pense
  • Re: Is "linear writing system" an established term?, Peter T. Daniels
• Afrikaans "potgooi", Harlan Messinger
  • Re: Afrikaans "potgooi", Ruud Harmsen
    • Re: Afrikaans "potgooi", Craoibhin66
      • Re: Afrikaans "potgooi", Craoibhin66
      • Re: Afrikaans "potgooi", Ruud Harmsen
      • Re: Afrikaans "potgooi", wugi
    • Re: Afrikaans "potgooi", Harlan Messinger
      • Re: Afrikaans "potgooi", Peter T. Daniels
      • Re: Afrikaans "potgooi", Ruud Harmsen
      • Message not available
      • Re: Afrikaans "potgooi", Jack Campin - bogus address
      • Re: Afrikaans "potgooi", Harlan Messinger
      • Re: Afrikaans "potgooi", Jack Campin - bogus address
      • Re: Afrikaans "potgooi", Harlan Messinger
      • Re: Afrikaans "potgooi", Jack Campin - bogus address
      • Re: Afrikaans "potgooi", Harlan Messinger
      • Re: Afrikaans "potgooi", mb
      • Message not available
      • Re: Afrikaans "potgooi", Ruud Harmsen
      • Re: Afrikaans "potgooi", Harlan Messinger
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Re: Afrikaans "potgooi", Ruud Harmsen
      • Re: Afrikaans "potgooi", Harlan Messinger
      • Re: Afrikaans "potgooi", Ruud Harmsen
      • Re: Afrikaans "potgooi", Harlan Messinger
      • Re: Afrikaans "potgooi", Ruud Harmsen
      • Re: Afrikaans "potgooi", wugi
      • Re: Afrikaans "potgooi", wugi
      • Re: Afrikaans "potgooi", wugi
      • Re: Afrikaans "potgooi", Ruud Harmsen
      • Re: Afrikaans "potgooi", Adam Funk
      • Re: Afrikaans "potgooi", Peter T. Daniels
      • Re: Afrikaans "potgooi", Ruud Harmsen
      • Re: Afrikaans "potgooi", Peter T. Daniels
      • Re: Afrikaans "potgooi", Harlan Messinger
      • Re: Afrikaans "potgooi", Ruud Harmsen
• Sanskrit revival, Harlan Messinger
  • Re: Sanskrit revival, Craoibhin66
• Re: Why does some culture's language become replaced but others don't?, Brian M. Scott
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Why does some culture's language become replaced but others don't?, aslan
    • Re: Why does some culture's language become replaced but others don't?, Craoibhin66
    • Re: Why does some culture's language become replaced but others don't?, Peter T. Daniels
  • Re: Why does some culture's language become replaced but others don't?, António Marques
    • Re: Why does some culture's language become replaced but others don't?, Craoibhin66
    • Re: Why does some culture's language become replaced but others don't?, Joachim Pense
    • Re: Why does some culture's language become replaced but others don't?, Ruud Harmsen
      • Re: Why does some culture's language become replaced but others don't?, Ruud Harmsen
      • Re: Why does some culture's language become replaced but others don't?, António Marques
      • Re: Why does some culture's language become replaced but others don't?, Craoibhin66
  • Re: Why does some culture's language become replaced but others don't?, Cory Albrecht
  • Re: Why does some culture's language become replaced but others don't?, Craoibhin66
    • Re: Why does some culture's language become replaced but others don't?, Trond Engen
  • Re: Why does some culture's language become replaced but others don't?, Peter T. Daniels
    • Re: Why does some culture's language become replaced but others don't?, António Marques
• Hi every one, Ammar Saleh
• What do you call this "embedded anagram"?, 2.7182818284590...
  • Re: What do you call this "embedded anagram"?, António Marques
  • Re: What do you call this "embedded anagram"?, Peter T. Daniels
• Telescope & Television, Daniel al-Autistiqui
  • Re: Telescope & Television, António Marques
    • Re: Telescope & Television, Joachim Pense
      • Re: Telescope & Television, António Marques
      • Re: Telescope & Television, Richard Herring
      • Re: Telescope & Television, Daniel al-Autistiqui
      • Re: Telescope & Television, Andrew Woode
• New!! - Create your own vocab site, Viral
• British English "Joshuer is", Marc
  • Re: British English "Joshuer is", John Atkinson
    • Re: British English "Joshuer is", Brian M. Scott
    • Re: British English "Joshuer is", António Marques
      • Re: British English "Joshuer is", Ruud Harmsen
      • Re: British English "Joshuer is", António Marques
  • Re: British English "Joshuer is", analyst41
    • Re: British English "Joshuer is", John Atkinson
      • Re: British English "Joshuer is", Peter T. Daniels
    • Re: British English "Joshuer is", Ruud Harmsen
      • Re: British English "Joshuer is", analyst41
      • Re: British English "Joshuer is", John Atkinson
  • Re: British English "Joshuer is", Paul D
    • Re: British English "Joshuer is", Ruud Harmsen
  • Re: British English "Joshuer is", Peter T. Daniels
    • Re: British English "Joshuer is", Ruud Harmsen
      • Re: British English "Joshuer is", Ekkehard Dengler
      • Re: British English "Joshuer is", Peter T. Daniels
      • Re: British English "Joshuer is", Ekkehard Dengler
      • Re: British English "Joshuer is", Ekkehard Dengler
      • Re: British English "Joshuer is", Peter T. Daniels
      • Re: British English "Joshuer is", Ekkehard Dengler
      • Re: British English "Joshuer is", Peter T. Daniels
      • Re: British English "Joshuer is", Ekkehard Dengler
      • Re: British English "Joshuer is", Peter T. Daniels
      • Re: British English "Joshuer is", Ekkehard Dengler
      • Re: British English "Joshuer is", Ruud Harmsen
      • Re: British English "Joshuer is", Peter T. Daniels
      • Re: British English "Joshuer is", Ruud Harmsen
      • Re: British English "Joshuer is", Ekkehard Dengler
      • Re: British English "Joshuer is", Peter T. Daniels
      • Re: British English "Joshuer is", Ekkehard Dengler
      • Re: British English "Joshuer is", Nathan Sanders
      • Re: British English "Joshuer is", Peter T. Daniels
      • Re: British English "Joshuer is", John Atkinson
      • Re: British English "Joshuer is", Nathan Sanders
      • Re: British English "Joshuer is", Peter T. Daniels
      • Re: British English "Joshuer is", Ekkehard Dengler
      • Re: British English "Joshuer is", Peter T. Daniels
      • Re: British English "Joshuer is", Ekkehard Dengler
      • Re: British English "Joshuer is", Reinhold [Rey] Aman
      • Re: British English "Joshuer is", John Atkinson
      • Re: British English "Joshuer is", Peter T. Daniels
      • Re: British English "Joshuer is", Ruud Harmsen
      • Re: British English "Joshuer is", Ekkehard Dengler
      • Re: British English "Joshuer is", Ruud Harmsen
      • Re: British English "Joshuer is", Ekkehard Dengler
      • Re: British English "Joshuer is", Ruud Harmsen
      • Re: British English "Joshuer is", Ruud Harmsen
    • Re: British English "Joshuer is", Ekkehard Dengler
      • Re: British English "Joshuer is", Ekkehard Dengler
      • Re: British English "Joshuer is", Peter T. Daniels
      • Re: British English "Joshuer is", Ekkehard Dengler
      • Re: British English "Joshuer is", Peter T. Daniels
      • Re: British English "Joshuer is", Ekkehard Dengler
      • Re: British English "Joshuer is", Peter T. Daniels
      • Re: British English "Joshuer is", Ekkehard Dengler
      • Re: British English "Joshuer is", Peter T. Daniels
      • Re: British English "Joshuer is", Ekkehard Dengler
      • Re: British English "Joshuer is", Ruud Harmsen
      • Re: British English "Joshuer is", analyst41
      • Re: British English "Joshuer is", Iain
      • Re: British English "Joshuer is", analyst41
      • Re: British English "Joshuer is", Marc
      • Re: British English "Joshuer is", Peter T. Daniels
      • Re: British English "Joshuer is", Reinhold [Rey] Aman
      • Re: British English "Joshuer is", Joe Fineman
      • Re: British English "Joshuer is", Marc
      • Re: British English "Joshuer is", Daniel al-Autistiqui
      • Re: British English "Joshuer is", Peter T. Daniels
      • Re: British English "Joshuer is", Ekkehard Dengler
• have people stopped covering their mouth when yawning in public?, analyst41
  • Re: have people stopped covering their mouth when yawning in public?, Harlan Messinger
    • Re: have people stopped covering their mouth when yawning in public?, Adam Funk
      • Re: have people stopped covering their mouth when yawning in public?, Peter T. Daniels
    • Re: have people stopped covering their mouth when yawning in public?, analyst41
      • Re: have people stopped covering their mouth when yawning in public?, mb
  • Re: have people stopped covering their mouth when yawning in public?, Richard Herring
  • Re: have people stopped covering their mouth when yawning in public?, Craoibhin66
• Re: Baghdad, Yusuf B Gursey
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Baghdad, lorad474
• Re: Why is walk spelt that way ?, Peter T. Daniels
  • Re: Why is walk spelt that way ?, Marc
  • Re: Why is walk spelt that way ?, Ruud Harmsen
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Why is walk spelt that way ?, ranjit_mathews@xxxxxxxxx
    • Re: Why is walk spelt that way ?, Joachim Pense
    • Re: Why is walk spelt that way ?, mb
      • Re: Why is walk spelt that way ?, Joachim Pense
      • Re: Why is walk spelt that way ?, mb
      • Re: Why is walk spelt that way ?, Peter T. Daniels
      • Re: Why is walk spelt that way ?, ranjit_mathews@xxxxxxxxx
      • Re: Why is walk spelt that way ?, mb
      • Re: Why is walk spelt that way ?, Ruud Harmsen
      • Re: Why is walk spelt that way ?, Peter T. Daniels
      • Re: Why is walk spelt that way ?, mb
      • Re: Why is walk spelt that way ?, António Marques
      • Re: Why is walk spelt that way ?, mb
      • Re: Why is walk spelt that way ?, Ruud Harmsen
      • Re: Why is walk spelt that way ?, mb
      • Re: Why is walk spelt that way ?, António Marques
      • Re: Why is walk spelt that way ?, mb
      • Re: Why is walk spelt that way ?, Ruud Harmsen
      • Re: Why is walk spelt that way ?, António Marques
      • Re: Why is walk spelt that way ?, mb
      • Re: Why is walk spelt that way ?, Ruud Harmsen
  • Re: Why is walk spelt that way ?, Emungo
  • Re: Why is walk spelt that way ?, M. Ranjit Mathews
    • Re: Why is walk spelt that way ?, Jack Campin - bogus address
      • Re: Why is walk spelt that way ?, Ruud Harmsen
      • Re: Why is walk spelt that way ?, ranjit_mathews@xxxxxxxxx
• 1950s American English intonation?, Sonja Elen Kisa
  • Re: 1950s American English intonation?, Peter T. Daniels
    • Re: 1950s American English intonation?, Craoibhin66
      • Re: 1950s American English intonation?, benlizro@xxxxxxxxxx
      • Re: 1950s American English intonation?, Joe Fineman
      • Re: 1950s American English intonation?, Paul J Kriha
      • Re: 1950s American English intonation?, Peter T. Daniels
      • Re: 1950s American English intonation?, benlizro@xxxxxxxxxx
      • Re: 1950s American English intonation?, Peter T. Daniels
      • Re: 1950s American English intonation?, benlizro@xxxxxxxxxx
      • Re: 1950s American English intonation?, Peter T. Daniels
      • Re: 1950s American English intonation?, benlizro@xxxxxxxxxx
      • Re: 1950s American English intonation?, Peter T. Daniels
      • Re: 1950s American English intonation?, benlizro@xxxxxxxxxx
      • Re: 1950s American English intonation?, Peter T. Daniels
      • Re: 1950s American English intonation?, benlizro@xxxxxxxxxx
      • Re: 1950s American English intonation?, Peter T. Daniels
      • Re: 1950s American English intonation?, benlizro@xxxxxxxxxx
      • Re: 1950s American English intonation?, Paul J Kriha
      • Is this scientific? [Re: 1950s American English intonation?, benlizro@xxxxxxxxxx
      • Re: 1950s American English intonation?, John Atkinson
      • Re: 1950s American English intonation?, António Marques
      • Re: 1950s American English intonation?, Peter T. Daniels
      • Re: 1950s American English intonation?, John Atkinson
      • Re: 1950s American English intonation?, Peter T. Daniels
• Neo-Aramaic dialect?, Sonja Elen Kisa
  • Re: Neo-Aramaic dialect?, Peter T. Daniels
  • Re: Neo-Aramaic dialect?, Marc
    • Re: Neo-Aramaic dialect?, Peter T. Daniels
  • Re: Neo-Aramaic dialect?, Ruud Harmsen
• Upload to your Site/Blog - 5000+ words/flashcard links, Viral
• Carolingian Kraljevina, Dušan Vukotić
  • Re: Carolingian Kraljevina, VK
    • Re: Carolingian Kraljevina, Heidi Graw
      • Re: Carolingian Kraljevina, Craoibhin66
      • Re: Carolingian Kraljevina, Harlan Messinger
      • Re: Carolingian Kraljevina, Heidi Graw
    • Re: Carolingian Kraljevina, Dušan Vukotić
  • Re: Carolingian Kraljevina, Harlan Messinger
    • Re: Carolingian Kraljevina, Dušan Vukotić
      • Re: Carolingian Kraljevina, Harlan Messinger
      • Re: Carolingian Kraljevina, Dušan Vukotić
      • Re: Carolingian Kraljevina, Harlan Messinger
      • Re: Carolingian Kraljevina, Dušan Vukotić
      • Re: Carolingian Kraljevina, Harlan Messinger
• Cross-post: New Episode on the Celtic Myth Podshow - Let Fly the Crows of Battle, Silverwolf
• Re: why can't the BBC, Ekkehard Dengler
• Scallywag ..., Heidi Graw
  • Re: Scallywag ..., Brian M. Scott
    • Re: Scallywag ..., Harlan Messinger
      • Re: Scallywag ..., António Marques
      • Re: Scallywag ..., Paul J Kriha
      • Re: Scallywag ..., Harlan Messinger
      • Re: Scallywag ..., Peter T. Daniels
  • Re: Scallywag ..., Dušan Vukotić
    • Re: Scallywag ..., Dušan Vukotić
      • Re: Scallywag ..., Dušan Vukotić
  • Re: Scallywag ..., Craoibhin66
• Re: You say Slavonic and I say Slavic, piotrpanek
  • Re: You say Slavonic and I say Slavic, Craoibhin66
    • Re: You say Slavonic and I say Slavic, Andrew Woode
    • Re: You say Slavonic and I say Slavic, piotrpanek
• Life is so short, mayashathvalani
• measuring VOT of voiced and unvoiced plosives, sd
  • Re: measuring VOT of voiced and unvoiced plosives, Peter T. Daniels
    • Re: measuring VOT of voiced and unvoiced plosives, sd
      • Re: measuring VOT of voiced and unvoiced plosives, Peter T. Daniels
  • Re: measuring VOT of voiced and unvoiced plosives, Nathan Sanders
  • Re: measuring VOT of voiced and unvoiced plosives, Neil Coffey
• Re: Early Europeans, Trond Engen
  • Re: Early Europeans, Brian M. Scott
  • Re: Early Europeans, Peter T. Daniels
    • Re: Early Europeans, Trond Engen
      • Dene-Yeniseic [Was: Re: Early Europeans], Trond Engen
      • Re: Dene-Yeniseic [Was: Re: Early Europeans], Trond Engen
      • Re: Dene-Yeniseic [Was: Re: Early Europeans], Peter T. Daniels
• Re: The case of the Hebrew word for "oxygen"..., mb
  • Re: The case of the Hebrew word for "oxygen"..., Daniel al-Autistiqui
    • Re: The case of the Hebrew word for "oxygen"..., mb
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: The case of the Hebrew word for "oxygen"..., Daniel al-Autistiqui
  • Re: The case of the Hebrew word for "oxygen"..., Daniel al-Autistiqui
    • Re: The case of the Hebrew word for "oxygen"..., Joachim Pense
• Minimalistic dictionary, milivella
  • Re: Minimalistic dictionary, benlizro@xxxxxxxxxx
    • Re: Minimalistic dictionary, milivella
      • Re: Minimalistic dictionary, Bart Mathias
      • Re: Minimalistic dictionary, Joachim Pense
      • Re: Minimalistic dictionary, milivella
      • Re: Minimalistic dictionary, milivella
      • Re: Minimalistic dictionary, Nathan Sanders
      • Re: Minimalistic dictionary, milivella
      • Re: Minimalistic dictionary, António Marques
      • Re: Minimalistic dictionary, Peter T. Daniels
      • Re: Minimalistic dictionary, Joachim Pense
      • Re: Minimalistic dictionary, Paul J Kriha
      • Re: Minimalistic dictionary, Paul J Kriha
      • Re: Minimalistic dictionary, Peter T. Daniels
      • Re: Minimalistic dictionary, Paul J Kriha
      • Re: Minimalistic dictionary, Joachim Pense
      • Re: Minimalistic dictionary, Peter T. Daniels
      • Re: Minimalistic dictionary, Joachim Pense
      • Re: Minimalistic dictionary, António Marques
      • Re: Minimalistic dictionary, mb
      • Re: Minimalistic dictionary, Joachim Pense
  • Re: Minimalistic dictionary, Harlan Messinger
    • Re: Minimalistic dictionary, milivella
  • Re: Minimalistic dictionary, analyst41
    • Re: Minimalistic dictionary, milivella
      • Re: Minimalistic dictionary, analyst41
• BBC does it again, Peter T. Daniels
  • Re: BBC does it again, Harlan Messinger
    • Re: BBC does it again, Peter T. Daniels
      • Re: BBC does it again, Harlan Messinger
      • Re: BBC does it again, Peter T. Daniels
      • Re: BBC does it again, Harlan Messinger
      • Re: BBC does it again, Peter T. Daniels
      • Re: BBC does it again, Harlan Messinger
      • Re: BBC does it again, Peter T. Daniels
      • Re: BBC does it again, Harlan Messinger
      • Re: BBC does it again, Peter T. Daniels
      • Re: BBC does it again, Harlan Messinger
      • Re: BBC does it again, Peter T. Daniels
      • Re: BBC does it again, Harlan Messinger
      • Re: BBC does it again, Peter T. Daniels
      • Re: BBC does it again, Harlan Messinger
      • Re: BBC does it again, Peter T. Daniels
      • Re: BBC does it again, Harlan Messinger
      • Re: BBC does it again, analyst41
      • Re: BBC does it again, Ruud Harmsen
      • Re: BBC does it again, Harlan Messinger
      • Re: BBC does it again, Peter T. Daniels
      • Re: BBC does it again, Ruud Harmsen
      • Re: BBC does it again, Ekkehard Dengler
      • Re: BBC does it again, Peter T. Daniels
      • Re: BBC does it again, Ruud Harmsen
      • Re: BBC does it again, Ekkehard Dengler
      • Re: BBC does it again, Ruud Harmsen
      • Re: BBC does it again, Harlan Messinger
      • Re: BBC does it again, Ruud Harmsen
      • Re: BBC does it again, Harlan Messinger
      • Re: BBC does it again, John Atkinson
      • Re: BBC does it again, Ruud Harmsen
      • Re: BBC does it again, Joachim Pense
      • Re: BBC does it again, Harlan Messinger
      • Re: BBC does it again, Richard Herring
      • Re: BBC does it again, Harlan Messinger
      • Re: BBC does it again, Ekkehard Dengler
      • Re: BBC does it again, Adam Funk
      • Re: BBC does it again, Harlan Messinger
      • Re: BBC does it again, Adam Funk
      • Re: BBC does it again, Brian M. Scott
      • Re: BBC does it again, Harlan Messinger
      • Re: BBC does it again, Brian M. Scott
      • Re: BBC does it again, Peter T. Daniels
      • Re: BBC does it again, Brian M. Scott
      • Re: BBC does it again, Peter T. Daniels
      • Re: BBC does it again, Brian M. Scott
      • Re: BBC does it again, Andrew Woode
      • Re: BBC does it again, Peter T. Daniels
      • Re: BBC does it again, John Atkinson
      • Re: BBC does it again, Brian M. Scott
      • Re: BBC does it again, Peter T. Daniels
      • Re: BBC does it again, Brian M. Scott
      • Re: BBC does it again, Andrew Woode
      • Re: BBC does it again, Ruud Harmsen
      • Re: BBC does it again, Peter T. Daniels
      • Re: BBC does it again, Ruud Harmsen
      • Re: BBC does it again, Peter T. Daniels
      • Re: BBC does it again, Brian M. Scott
      • Re: BBC does it again, Peter T. Daniels
      • Re: BBC does it again, Brian M. Scott
      • Re: BBC does it again, Harlan Messinger
      • Re: BBC does it again, Peter T. Daniels
      • Re: BBC does it again, Brian M. Scott
      • Re: BBC does it again, Harlan Messinger
      • Re: BBC does it again, John Atkinson
      • Re: BBC does it again, Harlan Messinger
      • Re: BBC does it again, Trond Engen
      • Re: BBC does it again, Harlan Messinger
      • Re: BBC does it again, Ruud Harmsen
      • Re: BBC does it again, John Atkinson
      • Re: BBC does it again, mb
      • Re: BBC does it again, Peter T. Daniels
      • Re: BBC does it again, John Atkinson
      • Re: BBC does it again, Peter T. Daniels
      • Re: BBC does it again, John Atkinson
      • Re: BBC does it again, Peter T. Daniels
      • Re: BBC does it again, John Atkinson
      • Re: BBC does it again, Peter T. Daniels
      • Re: BBC does it again, Andrew Woode
      • Re: BBC does it again, Peter T. Daniels
      • Re: BBC does it again, John Atkinson
      • Re: BBC does it again, Peter T. Daniels
      • Re: BBC does it again, John Atkinson
      • Re: BBC does it again, Peter T. Daniels
      • Re: BBC does it again, John Atkinson
      • Re: BBC does it again, Paul J Kriha
      • Re: BBC does it again, John Atkinson
      • Re: BBC does it again, Paul J Kriha
      • Re: BBC does it again, John Atkinson
      • Re: BBC does it again, António Marques
      • Re: BBC does it again, John Atkinson
      • Re: BBC does it again, Brian M. Scott
      • Re: BBC does it again, Ruud Harmsen
      • Re: BBC does it again, John Atkinson
      • Re: BBC does it again, Paul J Kriha
      • Re: BBC does it again, Paul J Kriha
      • Re: BBC does it again, John Atkinson
      • Re: BBC does it again, Paul J Kriha
      • Re: BBC does it again, John Atkinson
      • Re: BBC does it again, Paul J Kriha
      • OEQuoteFix (was Re: BBC does it again), John Atkinson
      • Re: OEQuoteFix (was Re: BBC does it again), John Atkinson
      • Re: OEQuoteFix (was Re: BBC does it again), John Atkinson
      • Re: OEQuoteFix (was Re: BBC does it again), John Atkinson
      • Re: OEQuoteFix (was Re: BBC does it again), Paul J Kriha
      • Re: OEQuoteFix (was Re: BBC does it again), Peter T. Daniels
      • Re: OEQuoteFix (was Re: BBC does it again), Paul J Kriha
      • transitive "agree"? Re: OEQuoteFix (was Re: BBC does it again), Peter T. Daniels
      • Re: transitive "agree"? Re: OEQuoteFix (was Re: BBC does it again), Paul J Kriha
      • Re: transitive "agree"? Re: OEQuoteFix (was Re: BBC does it again), Peter T. Daniels
      • Re: transitive "agree"? Re: OEQuoteFix (was Re: BBC does it again), Paul J Kriha
      • Re: transitive "agree"? Re: OEQuoteFix (was Re: BBC does it again), Peter T. Daniels
      • Re: transitive "agree"? Re: OEQuoteFix (was Re: BBC does it again), Horace LaBadie
      • Re: transitive "agree"? Re: OEQuoteFix (was Re: BBC does it again), Paul J Kriha
      • Re: transitive "agree"? Re: OEQuoteFix (was Re: BBC does it again), Richard Herring
      • Re: transitive "agree"? Re: OEQuoteFix (was Re: BBC does it again), Ekkehard Dengler
      • Re: OEQuoteFix (was Re: BBC does it again), Brian M. Scott
      • Re: BBC does it again, Paul J Kriha
      • Re: BBC does it again, Ruud Harmsen
      • Re: BBC does it again, Peter T. Daniels
      • Re: BBC does it again, Brian M. Scott
      • Re: BBC does it again, Harlan Messinger
      • Re: BBC does it again, John Atkinson
      • Re: BBC does it again, Harlan Messinger
      • Re: BBC does it again, Brian M. Scott
      • Re: BBC does it again, Harlan Messinger
      • Re: BBC does it again, Brian M. Scott
      • Re: BBC does it again, Harlan Messinger
      • Re: BBC does it again, Brian M. Scott
      • Re: BBC does it again, Harlan Messinger
      • Re: BBC does it again, Brian M. Scott
      • Re: BBC does it again, Peter T. Daniels
      • Re: BBC does it again, Brian M. Scott
      • Re: BBC does it again, Harlan Messinger
      • Re: BBC does it again, Harlan Messinger
      • Re: BBC does it again, Brian M. Scott
      • Re: BBC does it again, Harlan Messinger
      • Re: BBC does it again, Ruud Harmsen
      • Re: BBC does it again, Peter T. Daniels
      • Re: BBC does it again, Ruud Harmsen
      • Re: BBC does it again, Peter T. Daniels
      • Re: BBC does it again, Ruud Harmsen
      • Re: BBC does it again, Harlan Messinger
      • Re: BBC does it again, Ruud Harmsen
      • Re: BBC does it again, Nathan Sanders
      • Re: BBC does it again, Ruud Harmsen
      • Re: BBC does it again, Harlan Messinger
      • Re: BBC does it again, John Atkinson
      • Re: BBC does it again, Ruud Harmsen
      • Re: BBC does it again, John Atkinson
      • Re: BBC does it again, Brian M. Scott
      • Re: BBC does it again, John Atkinson
      • Re: BBC does it again, Brian M. Scott
      • Re: BBC does it again, John Atkinson
      • Re: BBC does it again, Ruud Harmsen
      • Re: BBC does it again, John Atkinson
      • Re: BBC does it again, Brian M. Scott
      • Re: BBC does it again, John Atkinson
      • Re: BBC does it again, Daniel al-Autistiqui
      • Re: BBC does it again, John Atkinson
      • Re: BBC does it again, Brian M. Scott
      • Re: BBC does it again, Daniel al-Autistiqui
      • Re: BBC does it again, John Atkinson
      • Re: BBC does it again, Harlan Messinger
      • Re: BBC does it again, Brian M. Scott
      • Re: BBC does it again, Nathan Sanders
      • Re: BBC does it again, Peter T. Daniels
      • Re: BBC does it again, Ruud Harmsen
      • Re: BBC does it again, Peter T. Daniels
      • Re: BBC does it again, Ruud Harmsen
      • Re: BBC does it again, Peter T. Daniels
      • Re: BBC does it again, Ruud Harmsen
      • Re: BBC does it again, Peter T. Daniels
      • Re: BBC does it again, Harlan Messinger
      • Re: BBC does it again, Ruud Harmsen
      • Re: BBC does it again, Brian M. Scott
      • Re: BBC does it again, Harlan Messinger
      • Re: BBC does it again, Brian M. Scott
      • Re: BBC does it again, Harlan Messinger
      • Re: BBC does it again, Brian M. Scott
      • Re: BBC does it again, Harlan Messinger
      • Re: BBC does it again, Ruud Harmsen
      • Re: BBC does it again, Peter T. Daniels
      • Re: BBC does it again, Harlan Messinger
      • Re: BBC does it again, Peter T. Daniels
      • Re: BBC does it again, Harlan Messinger
      • Re: BBC does it again, Peter T. Daniels
      • Re: BBC does it again, Harlan Messinger
      • Re: BBC does it again, Ruud Harmsen
      • Re: BBC does it again, Nathan Sanders
      • Re: BBC does it again, John Atkinson
      • Re: BBC does it again, Ruud Harmsen
      • Re: BBC does it again, John Atkinson
      • Re: BBC does it again, Harlan Messinger
      • Re: BBC does it again, Nathan Sanders
      • Re: BBC does it again, Harlan Messinger
      • Re: BBC does it again, Nathan Sanders
      • Re: BBC does it again, Harlan Messinger
      • Re: BBC does it again, Ruud Harmsen
      • Re: BBC does it again, Ruud Harmsen
      • Re: BBC does it again, Peter T. Daniels
      • Re: BBC does it again, Harlan Messinger
      • Re: BBC does it again, Ruud Harmsen
      • Re: BBC does it again, John Atkinson
      • Re: BBC does it again, Peter T. Daniels
      • Re: BBC does it again, Peter T. Daniels
      • Re: BBC does it again, Harlan Messinger
      • Re: BBC does it again, Brian M. Scott
      • Re: BBC does it again, Harlan Messinger
      • Re: BBC does it again, Brian M. Scott
      • Re: BBC does it again, Peter T. Daniels
      • Re: BBC does it again, Ruud Harmsen
      • Re: BBC does it again, Peter T. Daniels
      • Re: BBC does it again, Brian M. Scott
      • Re: BBC does it again, Peter T. Daniels
      • Re: BBC does it again, Brian M. Scott
      • Re: BBC does it again, Peter T. Daniels
      • Re: BBC does it again, Padraic Brown
      • Re: BBC does it again, Adam Funk
      • Re: BBC does it again, Harlan Messinger
      • Re: BBC does it again, Adam Funk
  • Re: BBC does it again, mb
    • Re: BBC does it again, António Marques
      • Re: BBC does it again, mb
  • Re: BBC does it again, Adam Funk
    • Re: BBC does it again, benlizro@xxxxxxxxxx
    • Re: BBC does it again, Ruud Harmsen
      • Re: BBC does it again, Peter T. Daniels
      • Re: BBC does it again, John Atkinson
      • Re: BBC does it again, Ruud Harmsen
      • Re: BBC does it again, John Atkinson
      • Re: BBC does it again, John Atkinson
      • Re: BBC does it again, Ruud Harmsen
      • Re: BBC does it again, Harlan Messinger
      • Re: BBC does it again, Ruud Harmsen
      • Re: BBC does it again, Ruud Harmsen
      • Re: BBC does it again, Ruud Harmsen
      • Re: BBC does it again, Ruud Harmsen
      • Re: BBC does it again, Adam Funk
  • Re: BBC does it again, John Atkinson
    • Re: BBC does it again, Peter T. Daniels
      • Re: BBC does it again, Harlan Messinger
      • Re: BBC does it again, Ekkehard Dengler
      • Re: BBC does it again, Harlan Messinger
      • Re: BBC does it again, Peter T. Daniels
      • Re: BBC does it again, Harlan Messinger
      • Re: BBC does it again, Ekkehard Dengler
      • Re: BBC does it again, Ekkehard Dengler
      • Re: BBC does it again, Peter T. Daniels
      • Re: BBC does it again, Ekkehard Dengler
      • Re: BBC does it again, Peter T. Daniels
      • Re: BBC does it again, Ekkehard Dengler
      • Re: BBC does it again, Peter T. Daniels
      • Re: BBC does it again, Ekkehard Dengler
      • Re: BBC does it again, John Atkinson
      • Re: BBC does it again, Ekkehard Dengler
      • Re: BBC does it again, John Atkinson
      • Re: BBC does it again, Peter T. Daniels
      • Re: BBC does it again, Ekkehard Dengler
      • Re: BBC does it again, Peter T. Daniels
      • Re: BBC does it again, Ruud Harmsen
• Re: Arabic phonetics, Al-jazeera etc,, mb
  • Re: Arabic phonetics, Al-jazeera etc,, Craoibhin66
    • Re: Arabic phonetics, Al-jazeera etc,, mb
      • Re: Arabic phonetics, Al-jazeera etc,, Craoibhin66
      • Re: Arabic phonetics, Al-jazeera etc,, mb
  • Message not available
    • Re: Arabic phonetics, Al-jazeera etc,, mb
• Portuguese lingual r, António Marques
  • Re: Portuguese lingual r, Ekkehard Dengler
    • Re: Portuguese lingual r, wugi
      • Re: Portuguese lingual r, António Marques
    • Re: Portuguese lingual r, António Marques
      • Re: Portuguese lingual r, Ekkehard Dengler
      • Re: Portuguese lingual r, Ekkehard Dengler
      • Re: Portuguese lingual r, António Marques
      • Re: Portuguese lingual r, Ekkehard Dengler
      • Re: Portuguese lingual r, Ruud Harmsen
      • Re: Portuguese lingual r, António Marques
      • Re: Portuguese lingual r, Ruud Harmsen
      • Re: Portuguese lingual r, António Marques
      • Re: Portuguese lingual r, Ruud Harmsen
      • Re: Portuguese lingual r, Ruud Harmsen
      • Re: Portuguese lingual r, Ruud Harmsen
      • Re: Portuguese lingual r, Ruud Harmsen
      • Re: Portuguese lingual r, António Marques
      • Re: Portuguese lingual r, Ekkehard Dengler
      • Re: Portuguese lingual r, Ruud Harmsen
      • Re: Portuguese lingual r, António Marques
      • Re: Portuguese lingual r, António Marques
      • Re: Portuguese lingual r, Ekkehard Dengler
      • Re: Portuguese lingual r, Ruud Harmsen
      • Re: Portuguese lingual r, Ekkehard Dengler
      • Re: Portuguese lingual r, Ruud Harmsen
      • Re: Portuguese lingual r, Ekkehard Dengler
      • Re: Portuguese lingual r, António Marques
      • Re: Portuguese lingual r, Ruud Harmsen
      • Re: Portuguese lingual r, António Marques
      • Re: Portuguese lingual r, Ruud Harmsen
      • Re: Portuguese lingual r, Ekkehard Dengler
      • Re: Portuguese lingual r, António Marques
      • Re: Portuguese lingual r, Ruud Harmsen
      • Re: Portuguese lingual r, Ekkehard Dengler
      • Re: Portuguese lingual r, António Marques
      • Re: Portuguese lingual r, Ruud Harmsen
      • Re: Portuguese lingual r, Ekkehard Dengler
      • Re: Portuguese lingual r, Helmut Richter
      • Re: Portuguese lingual r, Ruud Harmsen
      • Re: Portuguese lingual r, Helmut Richter
      • Re: Portuguese lingual r, Ruud Harmsen
      • Re: Portuguese lingual r, Helmut Richter
      • Re: Portuguese lingual r, Helmut Richter
      • Re: Portuguese lingual r, António Marques
      • Re: Portuguese lingual r, Ruud Harmsen
      • Re: Portuguese lingual r, Helmut Richter
      • Re: Portuguese lingual r, Ruud Harmsen
      • Re: Portuguese lingual r, António Marques
      • Re: Portuguese lingual r, Ruud Harmsen
      • Re: Portuguese lingual r, Ruud Harmsen
      • Re: Portuguese lingual r, Ekkehard Dengler
    • Re: Portuguese lingual r, Ruud Harmsen
• vocabulary, aarklon
  • Re: vocabulary, Dušan Vukotić
  • Re: vocabulary, Marco Pagliero
• Re: Sana < Thanaa, António Marques
  • Re: Sana < Thanaa, John Atkinson
    • Re: Sana < Thanaa, António Marques
    • Re: Sana < Thanaa, António Marques
  • Re: Sana < Thanaa, Nathan Sanders
    • Re: Sana < Thanaa, mb
      • Re: Sana < Thanaa, Nathan Sanders
    • Re: Sana < Thanaa, António Marques
      • Re: Sana < Thanaa, mb
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Sana < Thanaa, mb
• Words on your desktop - Vocabulary, Viral
• The meaning of Motor Trade Theory, Maria
• Re: Logical quotation., Nicko
  • Re: Logical quotation., Peter T. Daniels
• Antipassive + Split-Transitivity = Bleeding Head, justin . olbrantz
  • Re: Antipassive + Split-Transitivity = Bleeding Head, justin . olbrantz
    • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Re: Antipassive + Split-Transitivity = Bleeding Head, JNugent
    • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Re: Antipassive + Split-Transitivity = Bleeding Head, Peter T. Daniels
      • Re: Antipassive + Split-Transitivity = Bleeding Head, Ruud Harmsen
      • Re: Antipassive + Split-Transitivity = Bleeding Head, Brian M. Scott
      • Re: Antipassive + Split-Transitivity = Bleeding Head, Joachim Pense
      • Re: Antipassive + Split-Transitivity = Bleeding Head, Peter T. Daniels
      • Re: Antipassive + Split-Transitivity = Bleeding Head, Brian M. Scott
      • Re: Antipassive + Split-Transitivity = Bleeding Head, Joachim Pense
      • Re: Antipassive + Split-Transitivity = Bleeding Head, Peter T. Daniels
      • Re: Antipassive + Split-Transitivity = Bleeding Head, Joachim Pense
      • Re: Antipassive + Split-Transitivity = Bleeding Head, Peter T. Daniels
      • Re: Antipassive + Split-Transitivity = Bleeding Head, Paul J Kriha
      • Re: Antipassive + Split-Transitivity = Bleeding Head, Peter T. Daniels
      • Re: Antipassive + Split-Transitivity = Bleeding Head, Paul J Kriha
      • Re: Antipassive + Split-Transitivity = Bleeding Head, Peter T. Daniels
      • Re: Antipassive + Split-Transitivity = Bleeding Head, John Atkinson
      • Re: Antipassive + Split-Transitivity = Bleeding Head, Peter T. Daniels
      • Re: Antipassive + Split-Transitivity = Bleeding Head, John Atkinson
      • Re: Antipassive + Split-Transitivity = Bleeding Head, António Marques
      • Re: Antipassive + Split-Transitivity = Bleeding Head, Peter T. Daniels
      • Re: Antipassive + Split-Transitivity = Bleeding Head, António Marques
      • Re: Antipassive + Split-Transitivity = Bleeding Head, Paul J Kriha
      • Re: Antipassive + Split-Transitivity = Bleeding Head, John Atkinson
      • Re: Antipassive + Split-Transitivity = Bleeding Head, Peter T. Daniels
      • Re: Antipassive + Split-Transitivity = Bleeding Head, Joachim Pense
      • Re: Antipassive + Split-Transitivity = Bleeding Head, Peter T. Daniels
    • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Re: Antipassive + Split-Transitivity = Bleeding Head, António Marques
      • Re: Antipassive + Split-Transitivity = Bleeding Head, Peter T. Daniels
      • Re: Antipassive + Split-Transitivity = Bleeding Head, Paul J Kriha
      • Message not available
      • Re: Antipassive + Split-Transitivity = Bleeding Head, Paul J Kriha
      • Re: Antipassive + Split-Transitivity = Bleeding Head, Peter T. Daniels
      • Re: Antipassive + Split-Transitivity = Bleeding Head, Richard Herring
      • Re: Antipassive + Split-Transitivity = Bleeding Head, Peter T. Daniels
  • Re: Antipassive + Split-Transitivity = Bleeding Head, Peter T. Daniels
    • Re: Antipassive + Split-Transitivity = Bleeding Head, Helmut Richter
      • Re: Antipassive + Split-Transitivity = Bleeding Head, Peter T. Daniels
      • Re: Antipassive + Split-Transitivity = Bleeding Head, Helmut Richter
      • Re: Antipassive + Split-Transitivity = Bleeding Head, Peter T. Daniels
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Antipassive + Split-Transitivity = Bleeding Head, Ruud Harmsen
• Re: Best/Worst American Accents By Brits, Peter T. Daniels
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Best/Worst American Accents By Brits, Adam Funk
  • Re: Best/Worst American Accents By Brits, Peter T. Daniels
• "Gij" in Nederland, Ruud Harmsen
  • Re: "Gij" in Nederland, Ruud Harmsen
    • Re: "Gij" in Nederland, Harlan Messinger
• Re: Celtic initial mutation, ediebur
  • Re: Celtic initial mutation, Andrew Woode
  • Re: Celtic initial mutation, António Marques
• Re: Words starting with Pf-, Jack Campin - bogus address
  • Re: Words starting with Pf-, Craoibhin66
• Re: etymology of speech, conrad
  • Re: etymology of speech, Peter T. Daniels
    • Re: etymology of speech, conrad
      • Re: etymology of speech, benlizro@xxxxxxxxxx
      • Re: etymology of speech, conrad
      • Re: etymology of speech, benlizro@xxxxxxxxxx
      • Re: etymology of speech, Harlan Messinger
      • Re: etymology of speech, Marc
      • Re: etymology of speech, Harlan Messinger
      • Re: etymology of speech, benlizro@xxxxxxxxxx
      • Re: etymology of speech, Marc
  • Re: etymology of speech, Harlan Messinger
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: etymology of speech, Dušan Vukotić

We are proud to have Web Hosting and Rack Housing from 9 Net Avenue Deutschland.
(16)