Re: A new definition of the word "content"
- From: "Peter T. Daniels" <grammatim@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 17 Jul 2008 14:46:45 -0700 (PDT)
On Jul 17, 4:09 pm, "graph...@xxxxxxx" <graph...@xxxxxxx> wrote:
On Jul 17, 8:15 pm, Ivar Rosquist <IRosqu...@xxxxxxx> wrote:
So, that would imply that the majority of the linguistics
community does not accept this decipherment, right?
Yes, but the main reason is to be found in the BIAISED review made by
Yves Duhoux in 2000, which has been largely publicized, when at the
same time a reply correcting the FALSE accusations made by the
reviewer was CENSORED by the A.J.A. MOST of the scholars who read this
review have concluded that this solution was "not better than the
others", and it was a loss of time to read the original books and
papers... I would have done the same myself, if I had not got the
chance to know about this solution several years before... Since then,
all the scholars I know who have taken the trouble to be fully
informed about this solution consider it as "very interesting".
What grapheus-fauconau refuses to recognize is that there is no
specific "bias" against this one particular "decipherment."
The most reasonable assessment of the possibilities of interpreting
the Phaistos Disk is made by Harald Haarmann, who notes that no more
than its general purport can be imagined, and who compares it to other
examples of Minoan iconography (such as the Hagia Triada sarcophagus).
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: A new definition of the word "content"
- From: grapheus@xxxxxxx
- Re: A new definition of the word "content"
- References:
- A new definition of the word "content"
- From: grapheus@xxxxxxx
- Re: A new definition of the word "content"
- From: Ivar Rosquist
- Re: A new definition of the word "content"
- From: grapheus@xxxxxxx
- Re: A new definition of the word "content"
- From: Ivar Rosquist
- Re: A new definition of the word "content"
- From: grapheus@xxxxxxx
- A new definition of the word "content"
- Prev by Date: Re: A new definition of the word "content"
- Next by Date: Re: A new definition of the word "content"
- Previous by thread: Re: A new definition of the word "content"
- Next by thread: Re: A new definition of the word "content"
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|