Re: A new definition of the word "content"

On Jul 18, 9:12 pm, Ivar Rosquist <IRosqu...@xxxxxxx> wrote:
On Fri, 18 Jul 2008 11:51:13 -0700, graph...@xxxxxxxxxxxx:
On Jul 18, 7:58 pm, "graph...@xxxxxxx" <graph...@xxxxxxx> wrote:
On Jul 18, 7:42 pm, Ivar Rosquist <IRosqu...@xxxxxxx> wrote:

On Thu, 17 Jul 2008 13:35:29 -0700, graph...@xxxxxxxxxxxx:
On Jul 17, 10:25 pm, Ivar Rosquist <IRosqu...@xxxxxxx> wrote:
On Thu, 17 Jul 2008 13:09:00 -0700, graph...@xxxxxxxxxxxx:
On Jul 17, 8:15 pm, Ivar Rosquist <IRosqu...@xxxxxxx> wrote:
        So, that would imply that the majority of the
        linguistics
community does not accept this decipherment, right?

Yes, but the main reason is to be found in the BIAISED review
made by Yves Duhoux in 2000, which has been largely publicized,
when at the same time a reply correcting the FALSE accusations
made by the reviewer was CENSORED by the A.J.A. MOST of the
scholars who read this review have concluded that this solution
was "not better than the others",

        Who are the persons that endorse this decipherment?
        Can you
provide their names, together with the references where they issue
their endorsements?

Yes, I can provide their names, but I will not do it without their
consent.

        May I insist? How long do you think it will take you to
        obtain
their consent?

As long as it will take to the A.J.A. Directors to recognize that they
acted in a NON-SCIENTIFIC way by REFUSING to print a "Correction to
Yves Duhoux' false statements"!..

grapheus

Why are you insisting so much for knowing the names of the scholars who
personally told me about their deep interest in the "Proto-Ionic
Solution" ?

        I would like the names of those scholars who endorse the 1975
decipherment of the Phaistos disk, because such claims must be
independently corroborated. So far I only have your word, and I do not
know who you are.

This is correct, but you have to understand that it is THEIR business,
not mine, to make public what they think about the Proto-Ionic
Solution, and mre generally about the "Proto-Ionian Theory". I don't
want to look as if I was forcing them.. But you may conduct an enquiry
your-self, with TWO questions : 1)- Have you READ YOURSELF (not just
heard of...!!!) the four books J. Faucounau has dedicated to his
"Proto-Ionian Theory" ?.. 2)- What do you think about this theory ?
You will be surprised by the number of scholars, who having answered
YES to Question # 1, will say about Question # 2 : "Well, I find it
very interesting and worth of being more thoroughly explored!". My own
count : 100% !..

grapheus



.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: A new definition of the word "content"
    ... when at the same time a reply correcting the FALSE accusations ... Yves Duhoux' false statements"!.. ... Why are you insisting so much for knowing the names of the scholars who ... decipherment of the Phaistos disk, ...
    (sci.lang)
  • Re: A new definition of the word "content"
    ... "Correction to Yves Duhoux' false statements"!.. ... decipherment of the Phaistos disk, ... and mre generally about the "Proto-Ionian Theory". ...
    (sci.lang)
  • Re: A new definition of the word "content"
    ... when at the same time a reply correcting the ... "Correction to Yves Duhoux' false statements"!.. ... decipherment of the Phaistos disk, ... and mre generally about the "Proto-Ionian Theory". ...
    (sci.lang)
  • Re: A new definition of the word "content"
    ... when at the same time a reply correcting the FALSE accusations ... Yves Duhoux' false statements"!.. ... decipherment of the Phaistos disk, ... and mre generally about the "Proto-Ionian Theory". ...
    (sci.lang)
  • Re: A new definition of the word "content"
    ... same time a reply correcting the FALSE accusations made by the ... their consent? ... Yves Duhoux' false statements"!.. ...
    (sci.lang)
Quantcast