Re: International Conference on the Phaistos Disk

On Jul 16, 4:26 pm, "Peter T. Daniels" <gramma...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Jul 16, 7:13 am, António Marques <m...@xxxxxxx> wrote:

Peter T. Daniels wrote:
The attempt to make the clarification of the structure of thedisc
 vanish into thin air as something unimportant, by focusing on the
 marginal question of its autheticity,

If it's not authentic, why on earth would you and hundreds of other
"decipherers" waste years of their life on it?

I suppose even if it is a fake, people may think its maker did codify
information worth decipering there.

Why wouldn't it just be random impressions of a bunch of seals?
Wouldn't that make the fun even more fun, since there would in fact be
nothing there to be "deciphered"?

When they put together Piltdown Man, they obviously didn't try to make
it a coherent representation of a "missing link"!

Concerning your talking. that the disc has no structure
should settle this little dispute
http://web.gvdnet.dk/GVD002393/triple.htm
regards
hagen
.

Relevant Pages