Re: Pictograms in Chinese
- From: "Peter T. Daniels" <grammatim@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 24 Jul 2008 07:08:57 -0700 (PDT)
On Jul 24, 7:45 am, "graph...@xxxxxxx" <graph...@xxxxxxx> wrote:
On Jul 24, 11:07 am, Richard Herring <junk@[127.0.0.1]> wrote:
In message
<d6f8b302-4309-416b-9a7b-e01a05d2d...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
"graph...@xxxxxxx" <graph...@xxxxxxx> writes
On Jul 23, 12:47 pm, Richard Herring <junk@[127.0.0.1]> wrote:
Please don't do that. The article was written by Peter Daniels, not me.
Your unnecessary reposting has completely screwed up the attributions.
--
Richard Herring
Oh! You are right. Sorry about that..
Next time, I'll be more careful...
There is no call for a "next time." Please stop creating new threads
for old topics.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Pictograms in Chinese
- From: grapheus@xxxxxxx
- Re: Pictograms in Chinese
- References:
- Pictograms in Chinese
- From: grapheus@xxxxxxx
- Re: Pictograms in Chinese
- From: Richard Herring
- Re: Pictograms in Chinese
- From: grapheus@xxxxxxx
- Pictograms in Chinese
- Prev by Date: Re: The monumental stupidity of PIE theorists further illustrated
- Next by Date: Re: Minerva-paper on the Phaistos Disk : The main argument
- Previous by thread: Re: Pictograms in Chinese
- Next by thread: Re: Pictograms in Chinese
- Index(es):
Loading